Friday, October 30, 2009

Alaska's Pro-Life Movement, Personhood, & Parental Consent Initiatives

I am very happy and proud of the Pro-Life community in Alaska.

Not only is there a "personhood" initiative currently going on, which appears to be supported by the new administration: KTUU - Personhood Initiative but there is also a parental consent initiative also collecting signatures. That initiative can be found here: Parental Consent Initiative

It is important for states like Alaska to implement these initiatives and get them passed. Alaska is a pretty conservative state, but over 50% of its population is in the surprisingly large Anchorage area. Politics don't follow the spectrum and labels that the lower 48 states do. Therefore it is important for a place like this to show that the more "hands" off states (in terms of government control/regulation) uphold traditional American Christian principles in their laws and policies.

Things are looking good, but prayers and support are needed! Please follow the links above and support in anyway that you can!

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Bloggin' from the AK Time Zone is...

... difficult to say the least. We are 4 hours behind Eastern time. So as I sit here, just getting home from work, it is 5pm. Yet, on the east coast it is already 9pm. By the time I say hello to my wife, change, and maybe grab a quick snack, it is approaching 10pm. Since the "Blog cycle" is essentially 8am-10pm eastern time, I am BARELY sitting down to my computer by the time it is over. So it is hard to get a "jump" on anything. I will HARDLY be the first blogger to post anything, unless of course it is from ROME. But that would have to be an early morning event, and I would be staying up late to "cover" it.

Anyways... I am just letting folks know. I am trying to find my niche in this whole Cathologosphere, and I realize that breaking news probably wont be my forte while I remain here in Alaska. So I will need to learn how to put my own spin on things.

So let me know what you think. What kind of posts do you/would you like to see from me. What do you think I have done well, or not so well. I love getting email, and I love getting your input.

A final note... I wont be blogging until MUCH later today. So this would be a good opportunity for you to read some past posts, comment, and suggest things to me. I'd love to respond, comment, research, and sarcastically reply to anything you would like me to, so email away!

I leave you with this link from LOLSAints: A Lesson for Schoolchildren

Want to be involved in Catholic political discourse?

.... then head over to AmericanPapist and read his post about the USCCB and Health Care Reform.


Once there, he has the entire process of informing your priest, parish, and family & friends about the Catholic position on the current health care reform legislation. It is important that we American Catholics do not abdicate our role in the republic in which we live. We are called not only as Americans, but as believers in Christ to do what we can, individually, to fight against the evils that prowl this world. I can think of few evils worse than Abortion can you?

The post at AmP, has everything you need to get parish bulletins full of good information regarding this situation. If you don't think that Abortion funding is going to be included in the reform bill, just look at my last post concerning someone who opposes it, allegedly!

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

"Dear Cong. Stupak...."

...you broke our heart and our hopes. Way to hold firm to those "CATHOLIC PRINCIPLES."

I guess he never promised us the world... but it's sad how quickly the affair is over :(
CMR has a great summary of it if you don't want to watch the video.
H/T: Creative Minority Report

"...let's say we lost that amendment, we need 218 and we get 217... would I still vote against health care? If I had to vote my conscience, I probably would not [vote against it]."

Well sir, your conscience is rotten, and your "give it our best" mentality is weak. Im glad Thomas More didn't cave, that Joan of Arc didn't cave, and I am sure as glad Jesus didn't say, "well hey I got whipped, that's good enough, I am going to get off this cross now." So much for integrity....



I am definitely nominating him for a CERF award this week.
For more info on CERF see this post: CERF AWARDS
How sad :( I knew it was too good to be true... is it time to give up hope that Catholic Democrats exist in pure form?

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Christopher West, Theology of the Body, and Personalism...

... or what are 3 things that I am trying to figure out in my head. I really want to post about these things, but I don't really know where I stand on everything. I had planned a post today about "Personalism and Catholic Moral Childbirth" but I scratched that idea after seeing a few blog posts over the past few days dealing with Christopher West, Theology of the Body, and Personalism/Phenomenology. I know that a lot of people may not know what all or any of those things are, and thats OK! Ask me a year ago and I knew maybe one, and definitely couldn't explain it to you. I will try and provide a little primer below, and come back to this post at another time. As the CMR crew did as well, I open this post to comments hoping to inspire a little discussion and hopefully knowledge on the topics.

Christopher West: I know that a lot of hub-bub was out in the Cathologosphere(tm) a bit ago over Christopher West. (A quick blip from ABC):



This created some controversy, among some other things Mr. West said. A lot of his teaching was "misrepresented" on ABC, as the MSM does quite often to Catholicism. Yet, so many people had a problem with this, that BISHOPS had to issue a statement concerning their opinion of the situation:
Two Bishops Issue Defend Chris West's Theology of the Body Work

Meanwhile the Cathologosphere(tm) chimed in:
Matt Archbold @ Creative Minority Report: West Open Comment Post
The Fifth Column: West Commentary
Cheeky Pink Girl: "Christopher West Responds to His Critics"

So the question seems to be: What do Traditionalist Catholics and even more "Modernist" Catholics do with Mr. West?

I think the question hinges on your ideas on Personalism, what the Theology of the Body "SAYS," and how those two "items" apply to an American Catholics life. I don't think it is an easy question. But I would like to know everyones thoughts on this issue, so please comment.

On a side note: I think a major contention many have with West is not so much the essence of his message, but its means or method. The comparison to Hefner is ridiculous, yet West seems open to criticism and is willing to listen and change for the better. Let's see where this all ends up in a few months and as time progresses, especially as TOB and its teaching grows in this country.

Update: Stupak (D-Michigan) in a showndown with fellow Dems over abortion in health care bill

Te Deum laudamus! has an update on the Stupak situation regarding abortion and the health care reform bill. Read it over at:
Te Deum laudamus!: Stupak (D-Michigan) in a showndown with fellow Dems over abortion in health care bill

In case you don't remember we posted about this issue earlier. "Is Bart Stupak the new Bob Casey?"

In an interview with LifeSiteNews.com (LSN) today, Rep. Stupak said that he is counting on about 40 fellow Democrats to "take down the rule" - or kill the bill on a procedural vote - if House leadership refuses to allow a floor vote on an amendment that would prevent federal funding of abortion. The procedural "rule" vote would draft rules for debating the bill on the floor, and needs to be passed before the bill can move forward to a floor vote.

40 Dems? That is a TON in this sort of situation. Especially when the Dems are really struggling to get this entire bill off the ground. Plus, thats 10% of the entire House. It is nice to see that even on such an important issue, there are those willing to adhere to principles and morals. Let's hope this resolve stays strong throughout the battle!

St. Michael - Ora Pro Nobis!

Monday, October 26, 2009

Birth, Death, Sickness, and Strife...

... these are some of the issues I have been dealing with recently. I confusingly have my philosophy training, natural law training, and my Catholic Faith to try and sort these things out in my head. Unfortunately I don't have enough training in any one area to do myself much good. I have found an article on Birth and Catholicism, taking from a personalist point of view, so when I am done reading that and following some of the footnotes, I will post some thoughts. Consider this your teaser... or consider it a lazy post.

Bp. Trautman thinks the new Missal translation is 'elitist'...

...or he thinks that Catholics can't read well. Those are essentially the ideas he espoused at a recent talk at CUA (Catholic Univ. of America). You can find the full article at... wait for it... NCR of course! "Slavishly Literal translation of Missal criticized" ...

I can't do a full analysis because I am at work, but I have to quote one part, my Comments are in [Blue]:

He said the "sacred language" used by translators "tends to be elitist [Big words = elitist??]and remote from everyday speech [No one has ever said "everyday language" is the best language to learn things in... they sure don't use it at universities] and frequently not understandable" and could lead to a "pastoral disaster."[Did he just call "everyday" Catholics dumb? Of course he didn't, but did he imply something?]
"The vast majority of God's people in the assembly are not familiar with words of the new missal like 'ineffable,' 'consubstantial,' 'incarnate,' 'inviolate,' 'oblation,' 'ignominy,' 'precursor,' 'suffused' and 'unvanquished.' The vocabulary is not readily understandable by the average Catholic," Trautman said.[Where is Fr. Z - 'ineffable'!!!] [Also... He again implies the average Catholic can't read these words, or use the internet, or a dictionary, or expand their knowledge - we don't want THAT! Isn't that the mentality of the days gone past when Catholics were told not to read their bible for fear of "reading it wrong?"]
"The [Second Vatican Council's] Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy stipulated vernacular language, not sacred language," he added. "Did Jesus ever speak to the people of his day in words beyond their comprehension? Did Jesus ever use terms or expressions beyond his hearer's understanding?" [He contradicts himself here... YES Jesus used terms beyond peoples expression, hence nobody understanding what was meant by the Temple, or the Son of God, or how he was the Messiah! Had they understood he wouldn't have been CRUCIFIED!]
The rest of the article is pretty much the same... I will try and do more later... hopefully Fr. Z or someone else smarter than I am can give a more complete and intellectual analysis or response. Someone ask him... I really want to hear what Fr. Z has to say about Bp. Trautman's take on the "admittance to Heaven" thing... I'll get to that later if I can.

[[**UPDATE**]]:
So of course... I should have checked WDTPRS?.com before I posted, because I should have known that Fr. Z would be all over this. Read his excellent commentary:
Wherein Bp. Trautman runs down new translation and Fr. Z responds

Sunday, October 25, 2009

CERF Awards - Presented to...

...those who claim they are "Defenders of the Faith," "Spritual Warriors," or that they are "Defending Us in Battle" but in reality they just want to pretend that they are upholding the faith. In other words they don't hit any harder than a "Nerf."


I was inspired by the Maureen Dowd article that I referenced in the post prior to this one. I realized I should probably award this honor to folks, so that they feel good about writing about the faith and "Upholding" it... at least in the same way 7 year olds think that they are "fighting evil" when they shoot their household cat with a nerf gun :) I am using CERF as to not bring scandal upon the Nerf brand or company. So Ms. Dowd wins the award for this past week, and who knows, maybe as time goes on I will keep track and present monthly and yearly awards! So if you have any nominations, just send them in and we will see what we can do!


(***DISCLAIMER****: Nerf in no way sponosors this award. I am using Nerf in a completely satrical, educational, and referential way to explain the "soft" and "un-dangerous" way that certain individuals choose to fight the battle versus evil. I expect to make no money off of

Question: Should lay women or religious women run parishes?

The reason I ask is because that is the situation that my family has found itself in. There are problems in our parish just like there are in any other parish, but some seem specific to the fact that lay people "run" the parishes. Some seem specific to the fact that they are female... but that is more difficult for me to "KNOW" and I have to really on others, specifically other females, to explain why that seems to be the case.

I ask this for two reasons: First, I had a conversation about this with a woman who has been a member of these parishes for quite a while and seems to think it is very problematic. Second, is based on a lot of talk about the Anglican situation, the Rome visitation on American Nun's, and the general liberal dislike for the "Reform of the Reform." Fr. Z has a great post about this general subject:
"The Nun's Story"

So I was just wondering everyone's view. I know it is hard to have this converation in today's "equality minded" society. Trust me, I am married to a very intelligent and strong woman. I also grew up around women who could run things better than most of the men I know. But I also have seen that men and women are very different, in both positive and negative ways and that one gender can do somethings not necessarily better than the other, but in a more efficient or positive way. I wonder if those is one of them? Or is this more of a perspective issue?

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Making waves, speaking out, saving souls, and reforming the reform!

Oringinally Posted at: Orthometer: Why Do You Do It? Why Do You Make Waves?

So you, son of man, I have made a watchman for the house of Israel; whenever you hear a word from my mouth, you shall give them warning from me. If I say to the wicked, O wicked man, you shall surely die, and you do not speak to warn the wicked to turn from his way, that wicked man shall die in his iniquity, but his blood I will require at your hand.But if you warn the wicked to turn from his way, and he does not turn from his way; he shall die in his iniquity, but you will have saved your life.
--Ezekiel 33: 7-9





I came home and this was posted over at Orthometer... and boy did I need it. I had just come from a chance meeting with someone from my new parish area, and had a talk about this very subject. I was worried that I was not on the right path or mind-track, but I realized that we are called to uphold the commands of God. Sometimes it isn't popular but it is always required.


Prayer Challenge: Carry a Rosary with you!



A few years ago I was listening to a radio program on Catholic radio and heard a pries talking about how he ALWAYS carried a Rosary with him. I thought to myself, "Always?" He proceeded to explain, ALWAYS. Even while swimming one day at a local public pool, some of his students approached him and he pulled it out of his pocket, a plastic one he carried specifically for such situations, one capable of getting wet. So I thought, "What a great idea?" (I will save you the reasons behind my desire to do this, and my faith journey story... but if you'd like to know just ask).

This priest explained that he started doing it because he realized he wasn't praying enough. He also did it as his devotion to Mary began to grow. He decided one day to count the times he prayed each day, and did this for a week. He then carried a Rosary in his pocket for a whole week and counted the times he grabbed it and prayed, again doing this for a whole week. Im sure you can guess the results!


So I challenge you all to do the same! You don't even have to do a week each, try one day each way. SEE THE DIFFERENCE! Remember... you don't have to pray a WHOLE Rosary, or even a decade. Heck, don't even pray a Hail Mary every time (it would be nice :)) but just PRAY, ask for Prayers from Mary, and see the difference it makes! This will take NO time from your day, will not make it harder, and you can't "forget" to pray if you have it in your pocket :) Everytime you need a prayer or any time you put your hand in your pocket and feel your Rosary, say a quick prayer! (I put mine in the same pocket as my cell phone so that I am guaranteed to feel it :)

Let me know if you take the challenge and let me know how it goes! If you need a new Rosary check out "Aquinas and More's" Rosary Shop: Rosary Catalog

Friday, October 23, 2009

Hand-held & portable ultrasound device!

If you click on this link and head over to the American Papist: World's first portable ultrasound! you'll see what I saw this morning after spending some time at Adoration before work.


What a development?! AmP is right - these need to be bought up as soon as they are available! Not only for the sidewalk counselors but the Crisis Pregnancy Centers!

Think of the possibilities... tell me this isn't a God thing? An answer to some prayer from a warrior standing outside during the 40-days for life?

Isn't techno-logic-y fun?

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Ad Orientem: Or how to thank your priest on "Priesthood Sunday"



So bear with me on this post, but I got an idea and as some of you may know that can be dangerous.

I was reading my RSS feed and came across a post on the New Liturgical Movement about turning the Altars back "east," or at least saying Mass Ad Orientem. Check the post here: Reorient Those Altars Now
If you do any reading/research on Ad Orientem masses, you will find well reasoned arguments about why both priests and many parishioners favor it. For a priests take on it check out: Ad Orientem, posted by Fr. Longenecker over at "Standing on My Head." He is pretty passionate about it, and echoes what many other priests are saying; especially as more traditional worship styles are becoming more used and accepted.

You can find more posts by those who prefer such worhip behind these links:
Fr. Coulter
Adoremus.org by UM Lang
Bishop Slattery
and of course
one of many posts by: Fr. Z of WDTPRS?

This got me thinking? Why wouldn't a priest want to face God during Mass? Isn't that the point, to turn our hearts and souls toward God, and to worship him?  As I read some other posts, I cam across the fact that this sunday is "Priesthood Sunday," and of course we are in the year of the priest. (Priesthood Sunday Info) So I started thinking, "What better way to "Thank Our Priests" than by telling them that we want them to join us in "facing east" and worry less about entertaining us, worry less about OUR needs, and focus on God and his glory?"

We should all tell our priests that they should start saying mass Ad Orientem, not because we think it is better, but because it will give to them the gift of facing God during Mass. It will be OUR gift and our small sacrifice for them. In turn, as I am sure you realize, that the entire community with flourish and benefit.

So if you can't think of what to give your priest this Sunday, or what to do for him, send him the link to this post, or any other post about Ad Orientem Mass, I think he will get the point; plus who wouldn't want to look at some of these beautiful altars instead of staring at us? :)

Baby Names - Questions and Answers: A Thread

My wife and I are expecting in a few months, our first, and of course the NAME topic has come up quite a bit. We have been pretty civil with each other, but out fear is what others will say.

I have different thoughts on this subject but I figured I would pose some questions and then open up discussion in the comments section.

What do people think about "strange" Saints names, or Blesseds and Venerables? How about Pope John Paul II, do you name your son John Paul, or Karol? What about "long" Saint names, like Maximilian Kolbe, to ensure people know the "who and why" of the name?

What about traditions, like Joseph or Mary as a first name, but then using and calling them by their middle name? How do you utilize family names, like grandmothers names? Do you use the first or the last? Which side?

What do you all think? POST AWAY!

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Fabric Buyer for Production @ BCBG

Fabric Buyer for Production @ BCBG

It looks like we have a position opening up in production for a fabric buyer. Below are the responsibilites for this position. Please send your resume and cover letter to my email : nancy.angela.smith@gmail.com

--

Nancy Smith

Fabric Buyers Responsibilities

Ordering fabric

1. Set up Material Code (R.M)

2. Print mini markers (PDM) & compile with spec sheets, design cards,

3. Enter Bill of Materials

4. Run fabric position

5. Send an inquiry to mill, confirm price, & delivery. (Re-negotiate a better price)

Verify all information on spec sheet.

6. Enter PO

7. Send PO -confirmed received.

8. Send Hand standards & or pantones to mills

9. Flag Projection screen “Y” for fabric buys

10. Update PDR

11. Run BOM’s twice a week.

12. Follow up on all laps dips and strike off approvals

13. Bulk approvals & lining approvals

14. Send out comments

15. Transfer ownership –split po’s & send to nominated vendors

16. Follow up & request mills inspection report, packing list, commercial invoice

17. Store SGS in PDM

18. Cut 2 set of bulk 1 set to Nominated Vendor & 1 set for our record

19. Filing

20.Vendors Performance monthly

21. Memo trackers-review and make necessary changes if needed.

22. Close open orders once @ factory

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted By: Antonia Huang

Compendium Eucharisticum - Manual for proper celebration of the Mass

**UPDATE**:
Due to the fact that I post from a time zone 4 hours behind the eastern time zone, I am a little slow to news sometimes. So Fr. Z has obviously not only posted this story but updated as well. I should probably read all of my RSS feeds before posting.
Read his updates here:
Details about the new Compendium Eucharisticum


The CNA posted this story earlier:
Manual for proper celebration of the Mass presented to the Pope

EXCITING! Something official like this is definitely encouraging! It means that people can't simply dismiss such a publication as "the thoughts and ideas of an uber-fundamentalist."

According to the daily edition of L’Osservatore Romano, the document “puts together texts from the Catechism of the Catholic Church, prayers, theological explanations of the Roman Missal’s Eucharistic prayers and everything that may be useful for the correct understanding, celebration and adoration of the Sacrament on the altar.”
L’Osservatore Romano also explained that the Pope’s desire is that the compendium will help both priests and laity in “believing, celebrating and increasingly living out the Eucharistic Mystery.” The Holy Father also hopes that it will stimulate “every faithful person to make of their own lives a spiritual worship,” the paper added.
Wow... you combine this with "The Spirit of the Liturgy" by Pope Benedict, writing as Cardinal Ratzinger, and you have a Mass primer set that is second to none!

Voting Machine Scandal?

There are some reports over one of the big voting machine companies that has popped up on some of the techy/gadget blogs today. I debated internally whether to even post this, mainly because it isn't a smoking gun, and doesn't say a whole other than, "TOLD YOU SO."

BoingBoing has the story here:
Voting machine source-code leak shows election-rigging subroutines?

It is pretty technical stuff, and the comments seem to be more insightful than the post itself, but it does shed some light on the issue. We all know the potential problems with these machines. We also know the conspiracy theories behind them as well. This makes all of those seem a lot closer to reality, than I think anyone would like.

I am not going to spend a lot of time or effort researching this, and it is a little off topic for this blog, but I figured it would be good to get out there.

Anti- Catholicism in America - Jusitce Alito sees it, do you?

Is there Anti-Catholicism in America? Of course there is. There is "Anti" everything in this country, and that isn't always a bad thing. The important questions to ask are:
  • how pervasive is the "Anti" sentiment?
  • is it growing or shrinking?
  • why does it exist?
  • and in what form does it exist?
The answers to these questions aren't that easy to answer, but lets try.

How pervasive? I don't know, there seems to be some element of it, and it has existed since the birth of our nation. If you read, "Render Unto Caesar" by Abp. Chaput, he outlines the early days of American Anti-Catholicism. I think things have definitely improved, but there are still pockets and ideas out there. I think it is far to say that Anti-Christian beliefs are more prevalent. Anti-Religious, even more so.

Is it growing or shrinking? It seems to be growing. Why do I say that? Well, if you read the news at all, especially political news you'll have surely noticed articles recently discussing the faith of the justices of the Supreme Court considering another Catholic was added with Sotomayor. At first the articles seemed informative, but it appears the informational aspect of this news is turning inquisitive, in an Anti-Catholic sort of way. Justice Alito recently criticized these articles and journalists saying,

"respectable people who have seriously raised the questions in serious publications about whether these [Justices] individuals could be trusted to do their jobs."
If he sees that it is growing, it must be right?

The last questions are harder to answer. The why does it exist and what form does it exist really depend on the person with the view. I think that it is like any other prejudice for the most part, a lack of understanding, mixed with bias, sprinkled with some long standing notions of fear, and BAM! you have yourself some Anti-Catholic sentiment.

I am not going to fear-monger, but if the media questions "another" Catholic being appointed to the bench, especially by a liberal President, what's next? I am not to worried, in fact I am oddly optimistic that this is a good sign.

You see, when I first started this blog a few weeks ago, I had no traffic. (I still don't have a ton, thanks to the fact that backlinking doesn't seem to work, and Haloscan is now something else?) So I read some websites on the best way to strongly build traffic, without the use of gimmicks and the like. As I read, I came across an article that essentially said, "You know you have made it when you get nasty comments, emails, or better yet, an anti-yourwebsite appears!" It makes sense though doesn't it? If you have nothing worth saying, people won't mind or care. But the second you start saying or doing something worthwhile, people will speak up. If you say something too good, or too worthwhile, the dissenters will flock like... well whatever flocks to good comments :)

As Pope Benedict continues to strengthen the faith through tradition and outreach, as younger and younger Catholics embrace that tradition and return to devoted worship, and as more and more Catholics are willing to step out into the public sphere it is no wonder that those that Catholicism fights against will start to shout. As I stated in the first post of this blog, and base its entire premise on, we are in a spiritual battle whether we like to admit it or not. So stand firm and know that as the battle gets tougher, we know we are getting closer to victory!

So rest easy Justice Alito. It is a little disheartening, but you can't make everyone happy all the time. So rather than worrying to much right now, take it as a sign that Catholicism is on the upswing, and people are taking notice!

**UPDATE**:
Mr. Peters over at "American Papist" posted about this and I didn't see it until this afternoon. Of course check out the insightful comments as well.


Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Traditional (Tridentine) Latin Mass News - Anchorage, Alaska

For those that don't know, I currently reside in Alaska. It is QUITE a change from the Detroit, Michigan area. I live about 3 hours south of Anchorage, and there are 2 churches within "Sunday Mass" driving distance. Both are run by parish administrators (lay women who operationally run the church). The priests are mission priests, Oblates to be more specific.

In Alaska, there is essentially 1 TLM mass site that I know of, which is in Fairbanks. That is a 12 hour drive :)

The Archbishop has "greenlighted" a Saturday evening celebration of the Sunday High Mass. It will take place in the Anchorage church of the Holy Family Cathedral. A website dedicated to the the TLM in Alaska has the news: Summorum Ponitificum Alaska

This is great news! Now the trick will be to get some "monthly" celebrations in other areas of the diocese. I am not greedy, but Anchorage is a 3 hour drive, one way. With gas at $3.55 in Alaska, that's an expensive Mass.

"America," Michael Winters, and the "forced smile." - Anglican-Catholic Coverage

There have been all sorts of these stories out there today: Lambeth Palace Opposed to New Anglican Plans

Not everyone seems to be happy with the news from Rome and England today. There are those out there that see this as something that it is not. Why they see it that way, really depends on who is doing the talking.
What is most disturbing though is that a lot of the whining is coming from a certain strand of Catholics. I dare use a label or the L-word. But these murmurs definitely spawn from a certain ideological or philosophical platform.
A good example of this is Michael Winter's piece on the America website. You see, the displeasure is not immediately apparent. It is hidden in undertones and semantic stylings. Some, like the AmericanPapist, laughingly theorize that it is out of some "fear" Winter's has that these Anglicans might be more "Catholic" than he. There seems to be a strain with these Catholics that these reconciliations (SSPX, Anglican, etc...) are an affront to their "way" of life. The perceive this as a Gerrymandering of types. If there is an influx of more 'traditional' elements to the faith, added to the already growing trend of traditionalist within the faith, where does that leave the 'progressive/liberal/new style Catholic?'

You see, Winter's states in his piece:
But, I worry, too, that some of these newcomers will also be nostalgists, anti-feminists, and anti-gay bigots. The ordaining of an openly gay bishop in New Hampshire is not something I would have advised, but after all these centuries of schism, I am not sure why that should have been the straw that broke the camel’s back. The first email I received this morning was from a Jewish friend who saw this aspect of the development when he wrote: "Do you think Pope B- might set up a Jewish rite if we asked him? We could call it Judaism. He could call it unity with church. Everyone's happy."
Sure, he laces his words with "bad" language, the type that makes you easily agree. Words like 'anti,' bigot, and schism. But when was reconciliation ever a bad thing? When did we shoot the 'Prodigal Son' simply because he returned? Also, where is it in the Bible where Jesus goes out and slaughters the 1 lamb, because it ran away from the other 99? This strain of Catholics, and thinking is doing a lot of damage to these 'reconciliation' efforts, at least internally. Why must we fight ourselves?
Sometimes you should keep your enemies close, and your friends closer. Because well... you know the rest of the cliche: "With friends like these..."

Breaking: Catholic Church of England, Anglicans, And Rome

The official statement from the Catholic Church of England is here: Statement


Joint Statement by The Archbishop of Westminster and The Archbishop of Canterbury
Today’s announcement of the Apostolic Constitution is a response by Pope Benedict XVI to a number of requests over the past few years to the Holy See from groups of Anglicans who wish to enter into full visible communion with the Roman Catholic Church, and are willing to declare that they share a common Catholic faith and accept the Petrine ministry as willed by Christ for his Church.
Pope Benedict XVI has approved, within the Apostolic Constitution, a canonical structure that provides for Personal Ordinariates, which will allow former Anglicans to enter full communion with the Catholic Church while preserving elements of distinctive Anglican spiritual patrimony.
The announcement of this Apostolic Constitution brings to an end a period of uncertainty for such groups who have nurtured hopes of new ways of embracing unity with the Catholic Church. It will now be up to those who have made requests to the Holy See to respond to the Apostolic Constitution.
The Apostolic Constitution is further recognition of the substantial overlap in faith, doctrine and spirituality between the Catholic Church and the Anglican tradition. Without the dialogues of the past forty years, this recognition would not have been possible, nor would hopes for full visible unity have been nurtured. In this sense, this Apostolic Constitution is one consequence of ecumenical dialogue between the Catholic Church and the Anglican Communion.
The on-going official dialogue between the Catholic Church and the Anglican Communion provides the basis for our continuing cooperation. The Anglican Roman Catholic International Commission (ARCIC) and International Anglican Roman Catholic Commission for Unity and Mission (IARCCUM) agreements make clear the path we will follow together.
With God’s grace and prayer we are determined that our on-going mutual commitment and consultation on these and other matters should continue to be strengthened. Locally, in the spirit of IARCCUM, we look forward to building on the pattern of shared meetings between the Catholic Bishops Conference of England and Wales and the Church of England’s House of Bishops with a focus on our common mission. Joint days of reflection and prayer were begun in Leeds in 2006 and continued in Lambeth in 2008, and further meetings are in preparation. This close cooperation will continue as we grow together in unity and mission, in witness to the Gospel in our country, and in the Church at large.
+ Rowan Williams
Archbishop of Canterbury
+ Vincent Nichols
Archbishop of Westminster
London
20 October 2009
[[ - UPDATES - ]]:



6:32a EST:
A few news sites, including some liberal catholic ones, are making this about something that it isn't. It is unfathomable to think that those claiming to be Catholic, would make this out to be about the adventageousness of Rome and the Vatican somehow "preying" on a "disgruntled" sect.
I think this quote from the Catholic News Agency (CNA) sums it up PERFECTLY:


Archbishop Augustine DiNoia, former under-secretary at the CDF until recently who helped draft the new structure, said: “We’ve been praying for unity for 40 years. Prayers are being answered in ways we did not anticipate and the Holy See cannot not respond to this movement of the Holy Spirit for those who wish communion and whose tradition is to be valued.”
He said there has been a “tremendous shift” in the ecumenical movement and “these possibilities weren’t seen as they are now”. He rejected accusations that the new Anglicans be described as dissenters. “Rather they are assenting to the movement of the Holy Spirit to be in union with Peter, with the Catholic Church,” he said.
6:12a EST:
THE NCR has their sour/twist on the topic: Of course focusing on the Anglican "angst" and 'Married Priests"


See Also:
Creative Minority Report - (Great Coverage Here)
Breaking: Vatican - Anglican Announcement
The New Liturgical Movement's Take

Breaking: Pope announces plans for Anglicans to convert en masse

Pope announces plans for Anglicans to convert en masse

This seems to be what is coming out of Rome and England. It is late here for me, so I don't know how many specifics I will get in before I must sleep. But this seems to be on track with what most were speculating. It may even be a little more far-reaching and all encompassing, as it seems there may be a full plan as to how to facilitate large numbers of Anglicans to enter communion with the Church and retain their traditions.

More as it develops...
Update: 4:39am EST:
AP Report
Creative Minority Report - Blog



Shared via AddThis

Waiting: Vatican to hold press conference regarding the Anglican Church

The hermeneutic of continuity: Holy See Briefing on Anglican relations tomorrow

See the above link for the basics. A lot of blogs are weighing in on this. Lots of speculation, but very little to go on.


My theory is a hybrid of a few going around right now. Some say that Anglicans are going to be brought into the Church, either through conversion or acceptance. Some believe it will be a "warming" of relations, similar to what SSPX received but in relation to the Anglican/Catholic relationship.

Some, as does Fr. Finigan, suggest that possibly the queen will be converting. Now while that is a stretch, lets look at some evidence of what theory seems on track:

  • "Summorum Pontificum" issued Motu Proprio in 2007
  • The Vatican and SSPX have warmed relations, including the removal of excommunication and the promise of "talks" on doctrinal issues.
  • The reworking or new translation of the Missal in English is due out in the next year or so, brining it back in line with the latin, older forms of the mass, and non-Roman rites (such as the Orthodox).
  • A trend towards traditionalism, universality, and orthodox principles of the faith during the service of Pope Benedict. 
  • The appointment of several traditionalist Bishops across the United States in the last year.
  • The appointment of various "traditionalist" members within the Vatican, some of American descent.
You take these moves, and other various "happenings" and you add them up. Now, of course the Vatican moves at its own pace. Sometimes it seems that it moves slower than many would wish, simply so that peoples hearts and minds can all be in the right place. Yet, it would be hard to ignore that these talks seemed to "pop" up. Add to this that Tony Blair has converted to Catholicism in the last few years, and England seems prime for a "change." I won't say that I "guarantee" this has to do with the Royal Family, but it wouldn't surprise me. Take stories like this from an Anglican Website which essentially puts their chips on the table for a switch.

Some other blogs that are carrying this news:

Both AmP and Fr. Z seem to think that Traditional Anglicans will be brought into communion with the Church. I think it might be as much as the entire Church of England. Of course that will then create some type of fissure, but "brick by brick" right?



Monday, October 19, 2009

Danny Abramowicz - Support A Catholic Speaker Month

I previously posted about "Support A Catholic Speaker Month" which Fallible Blogma is sponsoring.

The main post is here: "Support a Catholic Speaker - List"

The person I chose is Danny Abramowicz. The best way to find out about him is to head over to his site hosted by EWTN called, "Crossing the Goal."

Danny is a former NFL player, who spent a major part of his career with the New Orleans Saints. He now is a Catholic Speaker and advocate of the faith, and hosts a show on EWTN called "Crossing the Goal." The show is formatted similar to a sports talkshow, and therefore is familiar to men which is the shows target audience.

From the "Crossing the Goal" website:


Danny Abramowicz, former NFL all-pro wide receiver and coach, along with his other team members, has created a television show with EWTN Global Catholic Network called, “Crossing the Goal” which uses a sports show format to encourage men to get into spiritual shape.
Coach Abramowicz says, “He and his team consisting of Peter Herbeck, Vice President, Renewal Ministries; Curtis Martin, Founder of Fellowship of Catholic University Students (FOCUS); and professional broadcaster, Brian Patrick—provide real solutions to the spiritual challenges men face."
Segments include “The Kickoff” where the problem of the day is quickly presented; “The Game Plan,” where two team members lay out the facts men need to know; “The Red Zone,” where the team talks about how they’ve dealt with the problem in their own lives, and the “End Zone,” where each team member gives the audience a take-away for the week.
He also published a book called, "Spiritual Workout of a Former Saint."  If you click on the title it takes you to the Amazon.com page where you can purchase it if you'd like.

I chose Mr. Abramowicz, as the speaker I would like to highlight because I am a big sports fan. I hadn't heard of him, but his bio really impressed me. You see, he was drafted in the last round of the NFL draft in 1967 and then two years later was leagues leading receiver. He went on to coach later in his career, and eventually began ministry work. I am always impressed with folks that use their "positions" or "stations" in life for the greater glory of God.

More ways to follow Mr. Abramowicz and "Crossing the Goal":
Twitter: http://twitter.com/crossingthegoal/
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Crossing-the-Goal/180859155154


'Pro Multis' - Part II

There is a longstanding/ongoing discussion about the latin words: 'Pro Multis.' They are found in the consecration of the mass. I posted earlier about this discussion here:
Pro Multis Discussion

For most, it isn't a big deal. We hear the words every Sunday (or more) and think not to much of it. The debate above speaks for itself, and we can really reconcile the confusion and move on.


For those of you that don't know what I am talking about, the phrase 'Pro Multis' translates to 'for many' or 'for all.' It really depends on context and who you ask. A good question and answer section can be found at EWTN and various other places. The summary is that the Aramaic words meant a kind of combination. Through context and meaning, especially since the phrase was to be applied to the entire Gospels. The problem is that for a long time the LATIN texts were 'Pro Multis.' So teaching occurred on those words, and our faith doctrine developed with those words. Then in the 1970's, the vernacular translation switched it to 'for all.' Again creating confusion, until their was some clarity a few years ago. Like I said, all is fine at that point with a little research, digging, and understanding. Plus there is a new translation coming out in a year or so (hopefully) which will change it to align with the Latin for a nice union between the Norvus Ordo (our regular Mass) and the TLM/EF (the Latin 1962 Mass) so things will flush. It will also bring the Latin and Orthodox churches closer in liturgical form as well. So, I was satisfied. Until, yesterday...

You see here is a snippet from yesterdays reading of the Gospel from Mark 10:35-45:

But it shall not be so among you. Rather, whoever wishes to be great among you will be your servant;
whoever wishes to be first among you will be the slave of all. For the Son of Man did not come to be served but to serve and to give his life as a ransom for many.
So now what? I mean, it has to be from the same 'pro multis' form in the latin of the bible? I don't mean to be a traditionalist to the point of annoyance, and I KNOW when the new translation of the Missal comes out people are going to be frustrated, and annoyed. But this is why it is necessary. It will make everything SYNC up. Right now, we have to spend hours and hours explaining the doctrine because of silly and sloppy translations.



Need Motivation? Watch This!

The folks over at Fallible Blogma posted this video. I am not 100% sure if they posted it or if it was something they found, but regardless of that it is a great way to start the day. 

It really touches ME right now, because I am in the process of trying to find something called a career. After graduating law school I was blessed with a great opportunity and a 1year position, but looking forward is pretty scary. Especially since I feel called to integrate my faith and my career. I am also trying to figure out if I should stick just to the legal field, or branch out. It is a little scary, and of course the failure word looms large. This video gave me the inspiration I needed on a day like today, I hope it does the same for some of you!


Saturday, October 17, 2009

Marian Meditation - Question

I feel as though I have started posting too much random stuff to my blog. I definitely want to post about American Catholicism, politics, society, and other important topics that touch on our daily lives. But I also want to present questions and information ABOUT our faith as well. I know there are a ton of better and more informed blogs and sites out there for information, but I know that I find it helpful to read blogs that present things from the "students" point of view, so to speak. Sometimes the "minds that be" out there running the excellent blogs (see: Fr.Z: WDTPRS?; AmericanPapist, RorateCaeli).


So in that vein, I was saying a decade of the Rosary earlier, and I do that from time to time. I read a Holy Card, over at one of my favorite sites: Holy Cards There was recently a card that which quoted St. Therese.


"Sometimes
when I find myself spiritually in dryness so great
that I cannot produce a single good thought,
I recite very slowly an Our Father
or a Hail Mary.
These prayers alone console me.
They nourish my soul."

                                         -St. Therese of Lisieux




So after reading that, I have decided to take that up as as spiritual exercise. Each line of the Hail Mary, I ponder as to its meaning technically, as well as spiritually. This morning when I awoke I grabbed the Rosary I sleep with under my pillow and slowly began to recite the Hail Mary's slowly and began to think about something. 



Why did Jesus entrust us to Our Mother, and Her to us? Why is she so blessed? Why should we as Catholic's flee to her aid? 


I began to realize something new, that I have never read or thought about. I realized that Mary was the one human ever made who did not put Jesus on the Cross. You see, she was born free from the stain of original sin, and remained that way. (Reference to that) So then, she has no culpability for Jesus on the Cross. Now, there are other tangental questions to my inquiry, such as, "Did Mary have to be free from Sin?" "Why was she free from sin?" (in re: to the first question), etc... My inquiry/mediation goes more to the fact that she wasn't. She is said to be, "...full of Grace." God bestowed upon her a fullness of Grace, that kept her "stain free." I wonder though, is there teaching on the fact that she REMAINED as such when she said, "YES"? 


I wonder if you all have some commentary and thoughts on this? We appeal to a Mother, whom is guiltless in the death of Her Son, and yet so freely appeals to Him on our behalf. We are essentially His killers, and yet She is ever willing to come to our aid. It is a complete act of Motherly love. It is that type of love that worries not about transgressions of the past, and looks only forward to a time where we are truly happy and truly safe. It is also a humbling thing for us, to come to a person that we hurt so gravely by placing Her Son on the cross. Jesus knew perfectly, the mystery and the symbolic nature of such a Love, when he entrusted Her to us - as he surrendered Himself to Death.


Double Standard In the NFL Concerning Ownership (NSFC Links) - A Different Take

***WARNING*** ***WARNING*** ***WARNING*** ***WARNING***


There are links and words in this post that are NOT SAFE FOR Children/Catholic/Crocodiles/Captains (NSFC)


***WARNING*** ***WARNING*** ***WARNING*** ***WARNING***


Now... before I begin, I just want to explain why I am willing to post such things. I am not PROMOTING or even CONDONING what is "behind" the links I am posting. Sometimes though, to make points and explain things I need to link directly to the source. I will not ever post anything directly viewable on *this
* site that is inappropriate, but links may contain questionable material. Before making such posts, I will always attempt to warn readers. (Probably not with big red words, but in some manner)


Ok so this week there was a lot of talk about Rush Limbaugh possibly becoming a part owner in the St. Louis Rams. He explains the situation in his own words in the Wall Street Journal.


A lot of other media sources have their own take, which essentially take the position that this was all about race, but not because they wanted it to be, but because Rush had made it that way. Unfortunately that is not the truth. Media outlets like VIBE described the battle to be about principles and standing up against "hatred." What they didn't know was the double standard they were espousing.

WAIT!?!?! What? Not sure how that creates a double standard? Well let's start with a couple of presuppositions.

  • Let's say that Rush's past is tainted with "questionable comments."
  • Let's say that if nothing else he has made poor word choices.
  • Let's say that he has publicly said and done things that are hurtful to players and the image of certain players in the NFL, especially black NFL'ers.
Ok, now that we have our jumping off point, and I am not saying I believe all those things, or that they are true - it is simply painting things in the strongest light for the anti-Rush camp. Unfortunately, there are SEVERAL other part owners that currently have done much worse, than we are even placing on Rush with our heavy handed presuppositions.

Don't believe me? Check out the pithy post over at Big Hollywood: NFL Owners
I won't even mention words Plaxico, Pac-man, Donte', or Vick. That would be just too easy. Even eliminating those criminals, you are still left with a motley crew of owners. I guess what is good for the goose, ISNT good for the gander...


Support a Catholic Speaker Month - info


So the folks over at Fallible Blogma have a pretty cool thing going. It's called "Support a Catholic Speaker Month." Their goal is to get the Catholic Blogosphere to promote Catholic Speakers. They compiled a list of 101 speakers by previously running a poll/vote for readers of favorite speakers. They have now taken that list and are doing a cross-promotional type of marketing scheme to get bloggers and the speakers themselves a little more publicity and promotion. In actuality the idea is pretty genius and forward thinking. I mean what better way to integrate all sorts of online social networks, websites, and like minded people?

The way it works is:
  1. Readers of the blog and twitter feed (of Fallible Blogma) pick a speaker from the list and then do a profile of that speaker on their OWN blog.
  2. Then there is linkback to the FallibleBlogma.com.
  3. FallibleBlogma.com is then going to compile the list, creating a nice little resource for Catholic speakers.
So I am going to do this, and it really seems like a neat thing. I will post my speaker in the next post or so, but I wanted to get the idea out there, so there is a concept of what I am doing. Also, I wanted to get some readers (I have readers?) to possibly think about doing the same thing on your own blogs. Not only will it help some great speakers, but will get your blog some traffic. Just follow the links above and the rest is simple....


Thursday, October 15, 2009

Bp. Sample, Marquette, and Ridiculousness!


So a little bit of a controversy has been brewing in the land of Snow, Hockey, and Snow. For those not from Michigan, I am speaking of Marquette.


Recently the Archbishop of the Marquette Diocese, Bishop Sample, wrote a public letter to Aux. Bishop Gumbleton. For more on the original story choose one of the links below:

Now though, the controversy has taken a new twist. The local paper in Marquette, The Mining Journal, has a bunch of comments which attempt to attack Bp. Sample, but in turn end up just showing how clueless most people are about how to analyze socio-political situations. Fr. Z has a link here: What happens when Bishops act like Bishops


I think the worst part is that the paper didn't post anything in support of the decision. But what can you expect from the media. We just have to keep Bp. Sample and the diocese in our prayers. As I stated in the previous post about politics, evil attacks by making Catholics seem like the ones perpetrating the evil, as opposed to being the ones that are fighting it.


"The greatest trick the devil ever pulled, was convincing the world he didn't exist!"

American Catholic Political Issues ... what's important? - Part I

So I have been sitting at work going over different files, and I started to think (which is dangerous, trust me) about what are the really IMPORTANT issues that we as American Catholics face in our social-political-religious lives? As we enter election and voting season, I think it is vital that we take notice and call to mind what is important.

I don't want to be too broad in categorizing these issues, as appear to be OVER-INCLUSIVE, but I also don't want to be too specific and seem "one issue orientated."

  1. Abortion/Pro-Life: I know that 'Life' issues are paramount. I think that undeniably, more Catholic Theologians and Scholars would agree that defeating the Culture of Death in our country is critical, and may trump almost any other issue. It also bleeds into other issues and touches upon a lot of other issues.
  2. Family Matters: This "issue" labeled as such is a little broad, but it is the best term to encompass all the issues that I think are important. For example, marriage, child law, divorce, cultural/political thought and policy, and even media and social construction. A lot of the religious laws/voting issues tend to fall under this category as well. The Pro-life issue also lends itself to this topic. (Do you see a pattern forming?)
  3. Education: Not all of us are in school or have someone that we are responsible for that is in school, but at some point this issue was important to us. It is also an issue that will most likely be an important issue for us down the road, if it currently isn't on our radar. It of course touches upon Family Matters and the Culture of Life v. Death, and ties together.
Now there are a few that are clearly left out: Economics/Financial, Health Care, "Social Justice"; this was not inadvertent, and they didn't "just barely miss the cut." The fact that I left them out is intentional. See, I realized that those three topics are 3 very important and critical areas that we as American Catholics, or in the very least Christian Americans should concern ourselves with when it comes time to vote. The other issues will seemingly fall into place if we decide correctly on the first three.
I am going to make this post a multi-part series. So I wont expound too much, but I hope to show over the course of a few posts how these issues are what we need to think most heavily about. If we figure those out, the rest will be much more clear to us, and be easier to make our mind up about.
The sneak preview to the ANSWER or theory behind this is that these issues are the core and center of our lives and our FAITH! You see, these issues are addressed in the 10 Commandments of the Old Testament, and the 9 "New Commandments" of the New Testament. Sure, there are issues in politics that I didn't mention which we could align with the commandments, but again these issues are a kind of outline for how we should focus our thoughts on politics. Now, to be honest, I may revise this down the road a bit, I know that sometimes we can change how we think about things, but I really feel these are the big 3.
To keep in line with the theme of this blog, I want to briefly address one other point. That point is the fact that when evil or even non-catholic/christian opponents want to attack the way we as American Catholics try to live our faith, they attack us THROUGH those issues. For example, when they want to oppose life, sure they use "health care" as we see in the most recent debate over reform, but it isn't that health care itself is a catholic v. non-catholic issue. Instead, the crux of the question or problem is over the sanctity and respect for innocent life. To them it isn't about health care, they only say that because it frames the debate in a way that makes an opponent of their plan, look like an opponent of health care. Likewise, when education issues come up regarding sexual orientation, curriculum, etc., the issue isn't framed on the core question, it is framed in terms of "Education." That opponents of whatever wacky plan on the table, us Catholics, are trying to "oppose educational reform/progress/fill the blank with a buzzword." So you see, that is how evil works. The worst perpetrator of all of this is of course the entertainment industry, which I can't even begin to get into here. In the end though it again attacks through these avenues, in an attempt to forward some other agenda, all the while making Catholics/Christians look like enemies of "progress."

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Spread the News: November Summary by American Papist

Mr. Peters over at the "American Papist" has a good summary of issues and folks to follow this November - you should go check it out:

American Papist: Not Your Average Catholic!: 4 things for Catholics to support before November 4th


Like he says, we need to spread the word and get these folks and issues into office. Not only is it the best thing for our country, but the RIGHT THING TO DO AS CATHOLICS!