Thursday, November 17, 2011

Blogging Through the Catechism

A friend from Ave Maria, my law school, (I hope he doesn't mind me calling him a friend...) has started a blog called:

It is a section by section look at the Catechism, in bloggy-awesome-goodness.

In all seriousness, Stephen is an intelligent mind, and has a keen attention to detail. I am excited for his project, as it gives me an opportunity to read through the Catechism with the insight of a person I respect and who entered the Church around the same time I did. (I can tell he is already light years ahead of me!)

Take a few minutes and go check it out, and let him know that I sent you!


###

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Developing: Archdiocese of Anchorage set to release document(s)...

[[Developing...]]

...there are various reports, from multiple sources, that tell me that the Archdiocese of Anchorage is set to release a document, or possibly multiple documents...

Details are sketchy, and the last thing I want to do is spread rumors or gossip but this appears to be a done deal, and a fantastic development, all we are waiting on is the official announcement.

The subject matter pertains to the mass, posture, and norms here in Alaska, in the Archdiocese of Anchorage.

In other words:
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi...

As soon as I have anything...official, I will let you know. 
Until then keep your eyes on the Catholic Anchor.



[[Developing...]]

†††

St. Hubert, Patron Saint of...

...fur-trappers, furriers, and hunters... pray for us.

St. Hubert | R. León
On Good Friday morn, when the faithful were crowding thechurches, Hubert sallied forth to the chase. As he was pursuing a magnificent stag, the animal turned and, as thepious legend narrates, he was astounded at perceiving a crucifix between its antlers, while he heard a voice saying: "Hubert, unless thou turnest to the Lord, and leadest an holy life, thou shalt quickly go down into hell". Hubert dismounted, prostrated himself and said, "Lord, what wouldst Thou have me do?" He received the answer, "Go and seek Lambert, and he will instruct you." -Catholic.org
—†—

His feast is November 3rd, but if he intercedes for me and helps to guide some fur to my steel, I will venerate him and be very grateful.



†††

Usable Typewriters and Old TVs

Today I helped out a "resale" shop. It is one that uses its money to help within the community in various ways. Think Salvation Army, but Catholic-ish.

We helped discard over-stock inventory. This consisted of of taking "junk" to the dump and discarding it. We took a bunch of stuff, but the thing that stuck out to me, in a negative way, were the TVs and the Typewriters.

Once a proud lot
···†···
It broke my heart. As someone who doesn't have a TV right now, I wasn't jealous, but I just couldn't believe that we were throwing these TVs out. They were TVs that might not have worked 100% or were damaged enough that the others that the shop had in "stock" were more than adequate. This store is sort of the last resort for such items, so it isn't that they were being wasteful, they were in fact doing all they could to help find new homes for these things.

All that being said, I just found it so disheartening how wasteful and materialistic our culture is. TVs and Typewriters, things that once cost hundreds and hundreds of dollars being thrown in the same pile with broken desks and old mattresses. Sic Transit Gloria... 


I don't really have much of a point here without sounding sentimental and foolish. So, yeah, I guess the takeaway is... cherish things. Make what is old, new again. Not just for the sake of nostalgia, but for the sake of reconnecting with what once gave you a passion for something. The labor, the effort, the process.

Our lives, and especially our faith is a process... not an event. Live it accordingly. In all respects.


†††

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

I need 'Community"...

So, my world is dark right now. I have learned horrible news.
Community, the best show on TV, is going on indefinite hiatus. 

<<Time to collect yourselves.>>

I have no real idea of what that truly means in TV speak, but it isnt good when you have shows in the can, and promised contractually, and yet you have no idea when they will be on the air.

Ugh.

Here is some reasoning as to why:
In a recent interview with Digital Spy, Community creator Dan Harmon attempted to explain why his NBC show continues to get low ratings despite outstanding marks from critics. "Well, the average person comes home from work really tired, and just wants to flip through channels until they land on the thing that's the least objectionable to them,” Harmon said. “So they don't regard the television as an appliance that's supposed to spiritually satisfy them, they regard it as a thing that's supposed to comfort them and be a little stupid. It's not because they're stupid, it's because that's what TV has given them all their lives and it's hard to go out and do the work of finding a show.”

The sad thing is that he’s right. The worse thing is that this approach to television watching has resulted in Community being put on midseason hiatus.
I don't have a TV.
I watch everything on HULU.com.
So maybe I am part of the problem?
Regardless, I can't imagine some of the horrible drivel that will be on TV while Community will be sitting on the shelves. Again, I don't have a TV and have only caught a few things here or there, but there is some awful excuse for comedy called "Whitney"...

Ugh.

I can't believe I did an entire post about TV, but this is a sign that our culture really has no idea what it is doing. We want modern, secular, irreverent shows, and when we finally get one that does it well and without being too over the top... it gets ignored. People don't get it. Maybe because this show makes fun of TV in a kind-hearted way, it speaks past, or dare I say, over people.

Again, Ugh.

Back to regularly scheduled blogging... while my guitar gently weeps.



###

Better?

What was the last thing you did that made your fellow Catholics (friends, parishioners, family, etc...) better or stronger in their faith?

Not words... actions.

What talent have you multiplied?

Or are we too busy with our own worries, that we have just been burying whatever we have been given?




###

Monday, November 14, 2011

Earth: 'Not a very distinct place'

"Flying Bus" | Tom Johnson
There are a lot of things I wish I could do, and many things I pursue unable to really attain them because of small annoyances. Currently I am very interested and trying my hand at Trapping (along with Hunting.) It is difficult, because it is an art form really. It is a process, and not an event.

All that said, it is in the end a past-time, a hobby, a leisure activity if you will. It needs to be spiritual in some way, or it becomes lost within itself. Yes there are some people that live by it, that create an income, and while I wish I was one that was that proficient, it still would need to find its rightful place in my life. This is true of anything that is essentially part of the world, the earth.

From C.S. Lewis', The Great Divorce:
But what, you ask, of Earth? Earth, I think, will not be found by anyone to be in the end a very distinct place. I think earth, if chosen instead of Heaven, will turn out to have been, all along, only a region in Hell: and earth, if put second to Heaven, to have been from the beginning a part of Heaven.
In the end, Earth isn't all that important, at least in the spiritual sense. Our lives are important, but what the earth gives and represents, its importance comparatively, is miniscule. Yet we treat it with such reverence. We long for things of this place, and put them above all else. Jobs, money, homes, vehicles. We pretend that we do it all for the fun of it, but then why are so many, with so much, always feeling and talking as if they have so little?

††† 

Jingle Bell Java - Mystic Monk

Jingle Bell Java is in... and you should order some.



###

Sunday, November 13, 2011

Just One...

Maybe this will get Terry to chime in...
Just a couple of thoughts I had tonight:

If you could have a conversation with one Saint who would it be, and why?

Also, if you could own just one book (Bible, Catechism, and the Code of Canon Law excluded) what would it be?

This is hard, but my off the cuff answers are:

St. Thomas More, because I really want to know if he was as "witty" as he is made out to be. (A Man For All Seasons, Utopia, etc...) & Summa Theologica... 
or
St. Therese and Jesus of Nazareth (By Pope Benedict)
or...

This is too hard, I don't know why I even did this!!

Put your answers in the comment box please.


###

Friday, November 11, 2011

Thank You to All Who Serve...


May God Bless all those that serve our country by placing their life on the line, whenever they are asked.


###

"Dealing With Disappointment" - [VP Post]

Over at VirtuousPla.net yesterday, I talked about dealing with disappointment. It isn't easy, and we usually aren't ready for the crushing blows we receive. Yet, God wants us to treat disappointment as an opportunity to turn to Him, and to receive His promise.
Isn’t that how God works? When we ask God for something, and we hear ‘No…‘ we are usually so busy throwing a tantrum or feeling sorry for ourselves that we miss the whole answer...

Head over to VirtuousPla.net to find out the whole answer... ≥≥≥≥


•••


Thursday, November 10, 2011

"Today could have been a week..."

Kathryn Lopez, fellow Catholic, and writer for National Review tweeted that today, and she was right:
"Today could have been a week..."
A lot happened in the world today. Joe Paterno, Penn State, Rick Perry, Alaskan Storms, A Christmas Tree Tax that was and then wasn't, Oscar news taking a back seat to everything else, The 'Wall' is still down and hardly anyone remembered, we found out that Bill Keane died, and well... lots more. I couldn't possibly even touch any of these without writing a novel-length post... so I won't try. (I know, I am a quitter-before-I-start..-er).

As it always seems to happen on big news days, I was pre-occupied with life. I used to be a a news hound, in a former life and still play one on TV. Honestly, as someone that has worked on a newspaper and in politics, days like this are DEFCON-2 (the highest level this country has ever been - allegedly.) Anymore though, I seem to be busy when days like this happen. Corapi, Pavone, Bin Laden, and today just to name a few. I know my blog doesn't matter, in the grand scheme of things, but I still find it personally ironic.

I feel like God is sending me a message on days like today. I am off living, I get back to my computer and Wow, "that happened today"... wow. It is a message to me, that life keeps going and God keeps being God. Our lives aren't defined by what happens in the world while we are here, our lives are defined by what we do while we are here, even if it doesn't affect the world. God doesn't care how big we get, God cares how big we live our lives.

When I wake up tomorrow, maybe we will be back at DEFCON-5... but then again it is the start of Trapping Season here in Alaska, which I may try my hand at...

Oh darn, there I go living life again...


†††

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Abp. Dolan, Dr. Peters, Marriage & Canon Law: A Look at "Dolan's Decree"

On the 18th day of October, Archbishop Timothy Dolan issued a decree regarding the policy the Archdiocese will have pertaining to 'same-sex civil marriages." This decree is essentially a "shot across the bow" of anyone within the Archdiocese of New York, including clergy, informing of them of the Church's teaching on marriage, and the Canonical consequences for dissent and violation of these laws.

There is nothing earth shattering or new that is stated in this decree, that a faithful Catholic shouldn't already know and believe. Adherence to this decree is mandatory at both the Canonical level and from a Natural Law perspective. Again - there is nothing doctrinally new or original in this decree.

Also, as I expected, the world renowned Vatican Canonist, Dr. Ed Peters, has posted a detailed and precise explanation of the decree as it pertains and relates to Church Canon Law. In doing so, Dr. Peters, as a pre-eminent Canon Lawyer, has laid out the firm foundation upon which "Dolan's Decree" rests. Lest anyone within, or outside, the Church make any qualms over the policy, Peters' analysis is both rock solid and clear.

My Thoughts
···†···
Although I am no Canon Lawyer (I would like to be someday...) I like to discuss these matters because it interests me so. That being said, interest does not equate to expertise. The only reason I even dare tread on the same topics as folks such as +Dolan and Dr. Peters is because I don't think it is fair that they get to have all the Canonical fun.

_______ Authority

···†···

Dr. Peters takes a small issue with +Dolan's use of the term "moral authority." He says that he would have suggested canonical authority, but ultimately thinks that moral "works too." I thought this interesting so I did a little searching and quickly began to see that Dr. Peters was on to something.

In the New Commentary on the Code of Canon Law By John P. Beal, James A. Coriden, Thomas J. Green, I did a search for "moral authority" and it was only found in one instance. The concept of morality and its connection to a bishops ecclesial authority is not something that is improperly stated as moral authority, but I do agree with Dr. Peters that canonical is a better fit here. But this is a minor, minor point.

Decree Norm n.1
···†···
The point Peters makes about the first norm in "Dolan's Decree" is why Canon Law, and our Catholic Faith for that matter, are so instructive and interesting. Dr. Peters points out that the decree in essence has clarified that clergy should not even attend the 'same-sex marriage' ceremonies.
Decree Norm n.1 states:
(1) No member of the clergy (priest or deacon) incardinated in the Archdiocese of New York, or any person while acting as an employee of the Church, may participate in the civil solemnization or celebration of a same-sex marriage, which includes but is not limited to providing services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, good or privileges for such events. Ecclesiastical solemnization or celebration of same-sex marriages is expressly forbidden by Canon law.
Peters position is that:
I would take the decree to prohibit clergy’s mere attendance (as a type of ‘advantage’) at a “same-sex wedding”. Canon 209 § 1 is also relevant here, as is, of course, Canon 273.
To the casual or naive reader these Canons do not seem to say what Peters is making them to say, at all. Yet, Canon Law does not exist in a positive vacuum the way that Civil Law must. It is in fact, informed and grounded within the Natural Law. So, we must view the act of participation broadly, and in such a way that we understand it to mean that participation is equated with attendance. This is a fair reading and understanding, in light of Catholic teaching on Marriage. Some will try and read the paragraph in a narrow sense that interprets it as meaning only the acts mentioned or that actual literal act of solemnization or celebration of the marriage. This doesn't make sense in light of the remainder of the paragraph, or in light of a Catholic understanding of what Marriage is, or how it "occurs."

Why the Decree
···†···
What I think is most interesting, is that this decree doesn't say anything new. It essentially reiterates Canon Law, and Catholic teaching, on the subject of Marriage and the Sacrament of Matrimony. It touches, on its periphery, upon the idea of ecclesial and pastoral responsibility and authority, but does so only in terms of the larger Catholic question surrounding: what is marriage?

This is in my opinion, as I stated earlier, a shot across the bow. This is not only a public statement of belief by the Shepherd of NY Catholics, but also a warning to dissidents. As you can see from Dr. Peters analysis this is firmly rooted in Canon Law. This gives it a legal basis, as well as a theological one. It will be interesting to see who challenges this decree, and in what manner.


†††

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Storm of the... Ever!


That is a large area...
The Public Hazard Warning Area is almost as large as ND,SD, NE, & KS

Western Alaska is under a storm warning and public hazard warning in what is being called the "Worst Storm in History."

For those that don't realize it, Alaska doesn't mess around. We don't hype things up. Things are rough enough without sensationalism. When I woke up this morning, I was greeted with an outdoor temp reading of -4.8°F, others on my facebook feed were posting pics of up down to -15°. For the record, it is November. So tough circumstances are common place, especially the weather. So when the impending storm is considered so bad that Alaska has been exempted from the Nationwide EAS testing tomorrow, in case the system needs to be used for an actual emergency, you know things are bad.

So let us keep Western Alaska in our prayers. That part of the state is off the road system, that means that getting supplies, should they need anything, or sustain any duration of hardship, might become difficult. The method in shipment usually consists of boats and planes. But when the worst storm, ever, is passing this way, it is hard to get things out there. So let us keep everyone in our prayers.


†††

Presidential Pragmatism or Principle?


Today we are a year away from what could be a momentous day for us as a country. One year from today, we will be waking up the "morning after" the 2012 election. That means the possibility of a new President and new congressional members. If the polls are any indication we are in for a tight and hard fought race. If the press is any indication, it will be a dirty and scandal driven race as well, but when has politics every been pretty or nice? So the next year should be interesting...

Looking to 2012
···•···
Unfortunately, we have found ourselves once again in a dilemma as Catholics. We do this every four years. We look for the "perfect" candidate, only to come to the realization that no one is perfect. But we already knew that didn't we? No one is perfect. We are a fallen people, we are sinners, so why do we continually try to find and annoint someone as "perfect"? Over the last 15-20 years conservatives have been searching for the "next Reagan", and dont get me wrong I have a picture of Dutch framed, but he wasn't perfect either? So what are we doing, who exactly are we looking for?

Joshua Mercer, one of the preeminent Catholic political analysts out there, wrote today about a "Newt Temptation."
Like voting for Reagan in 1980 or McCain in 2008, I might be disappointed in the divorce, I would not consider it a deal breaker. But Newt’s second marriage to Marianne didn’t last until death do us part either. In fact, he cheated on her. And the “other woman” became Newt’s third wife.

But wait! Didn’t Newt convert to Catholicism? Doesn’t that mean that he’s performed an Act of Contrition and has been absolved of his sins? Yes, that’s very true. And Americans are a very forgiving people.

But does that mean we should promote him to be the leader of our country?

Right now we are in the middle of a national debate on what the nature of marriage is. The Republican Party’s platform calls for keeping marriage solely as a union of one man and one woman. President Obama, by stark contrast, has refused to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act and he has strongly opposed state marriage amendments.

Imagine what supporters of same-sex marriage will say if Newt Gingrich becomes the GOP nominee? “Newt Gingrich has been married three times, but he won’t let gays get married once.”

Is that fair? Maybe not. Does it matter if it’s fair? No.
His point is a good one. It dove-tails with mine, and it is that politics isn't about fair, and it isn't about what a person is today. It is about the total package. When we elect a president we are electing something more than just policy and politics. What did they say about McCain - he would be one missed heartbeat away from making Sarah Palin president. Age was a huge factor in the 2008 race for some folks, even it wasn't a deciding one, it still came into play.

So why are we looking for the perfect person, and what is close enough? Why are we treating our presidential politics like canned goods? We want the perfect can, because it makes us feel better about what's inside, don't we? Why can't we pick a president and not a pastor? Shouldn't we look at this whole thing a little more... oh I don't know, dare I say: pragmatically?

Principle and Not Pragmatism
···•···
No.
No we shouldn't.
This is about principle. This is about picking the best person for the job. Maybe better written, this is about picking the best person, for the job.

Great minds can be great advisors, but at the end of the day I want the person pulling the trigger, pushing the button, signing their name to be someone I trust. Someone that I believe in at the end of the day, full stop. I fear that we might not have that person in this group of candidates, because I want the perfect person. Which takes us right back to the start of this conversation. How do we vote? What do we need to see in a person, to vote for them as president. Is this a lesser of two evils decision? Because those don't generally sit well with most Catholics.

Many say it doesn't matter who is in office. The only difference between one or the other is where they get their money from, and then who they give a bulk of the money to. They might be right on some account, but I do believe at the end of the day it is important who sits in the Oval Office. I really do.

So we need to realize that picking who we support for President isn't going to be easy, but that doesn't mean we should cash in and give up. That means we can't succumb to pragmatism or polemic abstention. We need to do the hard and dirty work of trying to see which puzzle piece most closely resembles the picture we have carved out as Catholics as to what our next President should look like.

Don't get me wrong. I think the list of current candidates on the Republican side give me a cause for concern. They certainly make me pause. I think this conversation would be a lot different is names like Pence, Christie, and Palin were involved. Not that those people are closer to perfect, but because we would be talking about much different issues.

But they aren't so we have to continue working to figure out who it is that can lead this country back into a place of principled belief and economic stability. It isn't solely on their backs, but they play an important part. Our society and culture are being shaped on a daily basis by political decisions. We need someone as President that leads the effort to defining aspects of those elements that are reflective of the morality that a majority of Americans espouse. That is why the office of President is important. Because even if they aren't the penultimate determinative factor, they are symbolic of the direction and efforts that our political system is heading. We need to take this country in a direction, where our values are reflective of our virtues. Where what we do as a people stands on the principles of Life, Family, and Freedom.


†††

"A journey marked by hope in eternity"

Catafalque - FSSP: Ss. Trinita | Photo Credit: NLM

VATICAN CITY, NOV. 2, 2011 (Zenit.org).- Here is a translation of the address Benedict XVI gave today at the general audience.
* * *
Dear brothers and sisters,
After celebrating the Solemnity of All Saints, the Church today invites us to commemorate all the faithful departed, to turn our gaze to so many faces that have gone before us and that have completed their earthly journey. In today's Audience, then, I would like to offer a few simple thoughts on the reality of death, which for us as Christians is illumined by Christ's resurrection, in order to renew our faith in eternal life.
As I said at yesterday's Angelus, during these days we visit the cemetery to pray for our dear departed ones; we go to visit them, as it were, in order to express our affection for them once more, to feel them still close to us; and in so doing, we also remember an article of the Creed: In the communion of saints there is a close bond between us who still journey on this earth and so many brothers and sisters who have already reached eternity.
Man has always been concerned for his loved ones who have died, and he has sought to give them a kind of second life through his attention, care and affection. In a certain way, we want to hold on to their experience of life; and paradoxically, we discover how they lived, what they loved, what they feared, what they hoped in and what they hated precisely at their graves, which we crowd with mementos. They are, as it were, a mirror of their world.
Why is this? Because -- although death is often treated as an almost prohibited subject of discussion in our society, and there is a continual attempt to remove the mere thought of death from our minds -- it regards us all, it regards men of every time and in every place. And before this mystery we all, even unconsciously, seek something that invites us to hope, a sign that brings us consolation, that opens a horizon before us, that offers us a future. The road of death, in reality, is a way of hope -- and to visit our cemeteries, and to read the inscriptions on graves, is to make a journey marked by hope in eternity. 
But we ask ourselves: Why do we experience fear in the face of death? Why has humanity, to a large extent, never resigned itself to believing that beyond death there is only nothingness?  I would say that there are a variety of reasons: We fear death because we fear emptiness; we fear departing for something unfamiliar to us, for something unknown to us. And then, there is in us a sense of refusal, for we cannot accept that all the beauty and greatness realized during a lifetime is suddenly blotted out, that it is cast into the abyss of nothingness. Above all, we feel that love requires and asks for eternity -- and it is impossible to accept that love is destroyed by death in a single moment.
Again, we fear death because -- when we find ourselves approaching the end of life -- we perceive that there will be a judgment of our actions, of how we led our lives, especially of those shadowy points that we often skillfully know how to remove -- or attempt to remove -- from our consciences. I would say that the question of judgment is what often underlies the care men of all times have for the departed, and the attention a man gives to persons who were significant to him and who are no longer beside him on the journey of earthly life. In a certain sense, the acts of affection and love that surround the departed loved one are a way of protecting him -- in the belief that these acts are not without effect on judgment. We can see this in the majority of cultures, which make up human history.
Today the world has become, at least apparently, much more rational -- or better, there is a widespread tendency to think that every reality has to be confronted with the criteria of experimental science, and that we must respond even to the great question of death not so much with faith, but by departing from experiential, empirical knowledge. We do not sufficiently realize, however, that this way ends in falling into forms of spiritism in the attempt to have some contact with the world beyond death, imagining as it were that there exists a reality that in the end is a copy of the present one.
Dear friends, the Solemnity of All Saints and the Commemoration of the faithful departed tell us that only he who is able to recognize a great hope in death is able also to live a life that springs from hope. If we reduce man exclusively to his horizontal dimension, to what can be perceived empirically, life itself loses its profound meaning. Man needs eternity -- and every other hope, for him, is all too brief, is all too limited. Man is explainable only if there is a Love that overcomes all isolation -- even that of death -- in a totality that transcends even space and time. Man is explainable -- he finds his deepest meaning -- only if God is. And we know that God has gone forth from the distance and has made Himself close; He has entered into our lives and He tells us: "I am the Resurrection and the life; he who believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live, and whoever lives and believes in me shall never die" (John 11:25-26).
Let us think for a moment of the scene at Calvary and let us listen once again to the words that Jesus addressed on the Cross to the robber crucified at his right: "Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise" (Luke 23:43). Let us think of the two disciples on the road to Emmaus, when -- after having travelled a stretch of road with the Risen Jesus -- they recognize Him and quickly set out toward Jerusalem to announce the Lord's resurrection (cf. Luke 24:13-35). The Master's words come to mind with renewed clarity: "Let not your hearts be troubled; believe in God, believe also in me. In my Father's house are many rooms; if it were not so, would I have told you that I go to prepare a place for you?" (John 14:1-2).
God has truly appeared; He has become accessible; He has so loved the world "that He gave His only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life" (John 3:16), and in the supreme act of love -- in the Cross -- plunging into the abyss of death, He conquered it, He rose and He opened the doors of eternity also to us. Christ sustains us through the night of death, which He himself traversed: He is the Good Shepherd, in whose guidance we can trust without any fear, since He knows well the road, even in obscurity.
Each Sunday, in reciting the Creed, we reaffirm this truth. And in visiting cemeteries to pray with affection and love for our dear departed ones, we are invited once again to renew with courage and with strength our faith in eternal life; indeed, we are invited to live out this great hope and to give witness to it in the world: Nothingness is not behind this present moment. And it is precisely faith in eternal life that gives the Christian the courage to love our world even more intensely, and to work to build a future for it, to give it a true and lasting hope. Thank you.
[Translation by Diane Montagna]
[The Holy Father then greeted the people in several languages. In English, he said:]
Dear Brothers and Sisters,
Today, the day after the Solemnity of All Saints, the Church invites us to pray for the faithful departed. This yearly commemoration, often marked by visits to the cemetery, is an occasion to ponder the mystery of death and to renew our faith in the promise of eternal life held out to us by Christ's resurrection. As human beings, we have a natural fear of death and we rebel against its apparent finality. Faith teaches us that the fear of death is lightened by a great hope, the hope of eternity, which gives our lives their fullest meaning. The God who is love offers us the promise of eternal life through the death and resurrection of his Son. In Christ, death no longer appears as an abyss of emptiness, but rather a path to life which will never end. Christ is the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in him will never die. Each Sunday, in reciting the Creed, we reaffirm our faith in this mystery. As we remember our dear departed ones, united with them in the communion of the saints, may our faith inspire us to follow Christ more closely and to work in this world to build a future of hope.
* * *
I offer a warm welcome to the priests from the United States taking part in the Institute for Continuing Theological Education at the Pontifical North American College in Rome. My greeting also goes to the pilgrimage group from Saint Paul's High School in Tokyo, Japan. Upon all the English-speaking visitors present at today's Audience, especially those from Ireland, Denmark, Norway, Japan and the United States, I invoke God's blessings of joy and peace!
© Copyright 2011 - Libreria Editrice Vaticana
Lastly, I desire to greet young people, the sick and newlyweds. The day after tomorrow we will celebrate the liturgical memorial of St. Charles Borromeo, distinguished bishop of the Diocese of Milan, who, animated by the ardent love of Christ, was an untiring teacher and guide for his brothers. May his example help you, dear young people, to allow yourselves to be led by Christ in your choices, so that you may fearlessly follow Him; may he encourage you, dear sick, to offer your sufferings for the Pastors of the Church and the salvation of souls; and may he support you, dear newlyweds, in the generous service of life.
[The Holy Father then made this appeal:]
This Nov. 3 and 4 -- tomorrow and the day after tomorrow -- the Heads of State and Government for the G-20 will meet in Cannes to examine the main problems connected with the global economy. It is my hope that the meeting might help to overcome the difficulties that, on a global level, are blocking the promotion of an integral and authentically human development.
[Translation by Diane Montagna]
Link

•··(Hat Tip: V - Sancte Pater)

†††

Monday, November 7, 2011

"Per Ardua"

Photo Credit: Nasa | Link
"They that have climbed the white mists of the morning;
They that have soared, before the world's awake,
To herald up their foeman to them, scorning
The thin dawn's rest their weary folk might take;
Some that have left other mouths to tell the story
Of high, blue battle, quite young limbs that bled,
How they had thundered up the clouds to glory,
Or fallen to an English field stained red.
Because my faltering feet would fail I find them
Laughing beside me, steadying the hand
That seeks their deadly courage –
Yet behind them
The cold light dies in that once brilliant Land ....
Do these, who help the quickened pulse run slowly,
Whose stern, remembered image cools the brow,
Till the far dawn of Victory, know only
Night's darkness, and Valhalla's silence now?" ...

"Per Ardua" - by: John Gillespie Magee, Jr. 

This poem was unfinished at the time of Magee's death... and possibly his last.


†††

Children, the Mass, Noise & Toys: A Practical Guide

Oh, to dream...
"Mommy Blogs" are pretty popular, in fact, Catholic "Mom Blogs" are probably some of the most popular Catholic blogs, coming in a close second to blogs written by highly opinionated priests. This blog is neither. Priest blogs and mom blogs have the market corned on not only what is "hot" Catholic blogging, but probably more importantly write about the things that bloggers who read Catholic blogs enjoy reading about. It is about supply and demand. Therefore, when a priest blogger writes about a "Mommy blog" topic you have a post that is a force majeure, which is what has happened recently at "What Does the Prayer Really Say?"

Fr. Z. posted an email about Toys, the Latin Mass, and "noisy kids." He raises a few questions about such topics, maybe even more than he realized, and his comment box, of course, went off (currently at 73). It is ironic that he talked about this issue because our #1, the little Dino-Raptor (See how I did the mommy blog # & name thingy there?) has been increasingly loud and "noisy" during Mass. She is a very active child, and is nearing... TWO. (Yes, hide.) Maybe we are bad parents, maybe it is genetics, maybe it is because we don't know how... but she wont sit and just be quiet during Mass.

Now, I don't want to rehash the arguments or questions that Fr. Z. makes, and I know this is one of the hot-button-third-rail-ish topics of Catholic blogging, so I dont want to rehash it, as is. What I do want to do is talk about the fact that there are lots of opinions on this matter and I honestly think it is a parish-by-parish sort of thing and while there are maybe a few general common sense rules to follow, I dont think you can promulgate too much law on the subject. The problem is, there are some pretty basic rules to follow, but as a parent there are a lot of lines that seem to shift and move depending on who the person is drawing them. In other words, I think each parish/pastor is going to look at this topic in their own way, and therefore the only real rule beyond common sense is the rule or guidance laidd down at the "local level."

Children at Mass:
···†···
There is a "movement" out there that believes Children should not be at Mass. They cite Canon Law, Canon 11:
Can. 11 Merely ecclesiastical laws bind those who have been baptized in the Catholic Church or received into it, possess the efficient use of reason, and, unless the law expressly provides otherwise, have completed seven years of age.
They will then link someone like Jimmy Akin and "prove" to you that it isn't obligatory to have children attend Mass until they near age seven. There are other Canons that deal with "preparation" of Children to attend Mass at the age of reason, and "teaching them the faith" that make it necessary for them to attend Mass regularly prior to First Communion, so seven is a somewhat malleable age. Then these same folks cite the Catechism:
2181 The Sunday Eucharist is the foundation and confirmation of all Christian practice. For this reason the faithful are obliged to participate in the Eucharist on days of obligation, unless excused for a serious reason (for example, illness, the care of infants) or dispensed by their own pastor. Those who deliberately fail in this obligation commit a grave sin.
This Catechism section becomes the voila! piece to the "Children don't (shouldn't?) be at Mass" puzzle. I don't agree with this model, and I think that there are other Canons & Catechism Paragraphs that could argue against this theory. That being said, if you have a pastor that agrees, and a parish that is in general agreement, you might find yourself looking for a new parish, or in some cases, finding a happy medium to the "Kids don't have to be at Mass." Personally, I think if pastors start the idea of excluding, or suggesting the exclusion of Children at Mass, there is a problem in the way that the Mass is being looked at. The Mass is not a gift we give, or even something we create - it is given to us and we are there to worship God. If you want to cite a Canon, use:
Can. 1247 On Sundays and other holy days of obligation, the faithful are obliged to participate in the Mass.
No age is mentioned, and therefore compared with Canon 7, it looks as if this is a pretty grey area. Properly understood, it does seem that there is no obligation for children under seven to attend Mass. This Canon though adds some force to your argument that kids should be at Mass, and rightfully so. In the end I think this needs to be a family decision. Combined with some common sense, I think you can bring children to Mass without too many "looks to the contrary". I won't make the argument a child's noise is better than a Marty Haugen song, because that would just bring this conversation to a place it doesn't need to go.
Which brings me to noise...

Noise:
···†···
Generally, if your child is throwing a tantrum, bawling, or being extra noisy. You should relocate (temporarily) to the Narthex, Hall, etc... I won't say "God won't mind..." because I dont know what His mind is, but I will say that I don't think this is "bad" and most everyone will love you for it. A commentator over at Fr. Z's place even mentioned that  a priest once told her that not removing your child in this situation is a sin against modesty. I am not in a position to label or define sins to that level, so I will only say that I think remaining in Mass with an overly noisy or crying child is probably not the best choice you can make. But where the line blurs is at a "happy noisy" child. This is the "talkative two-year old" (my child) who isn't crying or being unruly, but also can't "be quiet." I think that you have to follow the rule that as a parent you have a "noise filter." You are used to your "noisy" child, and therefore, anything you hear is about 2-3x louder or more annoying than it actually is. The "Objects in Mirror are Closer Than They Appear" rule works best here. As a parent, I know there is an importance to teaching your child how to be at (and participate) at Mass. To do this, they have to go... and, well, learn. So this means slowly but surely teaching them how to do that. Each child will be different, but you have to be considerate of those around you. Occupying them, I don't think is wrong, because they aren't at the age of reason and don't have to be there. But, removing them when they are noisy is important. Where you go is up to you, and how long you are gone is another, but in the end a noisy child is disruptive, and it don't really let you focus in prayer either.
So, how to occupy the child's attention...

Toys, Books, Food
···†···
My beliefs on this subject are pretty interesting. I believed one set of rules here when I used to bring nieces and nephews to Church, but with my own children I have changed those rules. I don't think anything is OK. A few toy during the first few years is OK. I doubt I will allow it with my children, and haven't so far. But, I am not going to look down on anyone that does it. Also, if someone came to me and said, "My son Gilbert sits quietly if we let him bring his stuffed pet Lion named Aquinas" (Get it?) then who am I to say this is bad? I think there is an appropriateness of what to bring to Mass, and noise is one factor, but so are a few other things. In general, there should only be one or two toys, and nothing obviously against the teachings of the faith. The most appropriate thing would be something Catholic themed, which is hard to do but I am thinking something like a plush "Mass Kit". (I know it is expensive but tell me it isn't cool? Maybe a tad much for Mass though...) A doll is probably ok as well.

Books might be the best option, especially because of their "quiet nature." Yet, most little kids don't get a whole lot of time/entertainment value out of books. Again, books should be more of the Catholic nature but sometimes a book is a book.

As for food. I am anti-food at Mass. I know little ones sometimes need it, and that makes sense, I guess, but we never have used food at Mass. I can add the caveat that drinks or a "bottle" is OK, since my wife has nursed at Mass, but solids just seem counter-intuitive. I know that hunger is a major contributor to noise, but kids don't have to observe the fasting rule and well, a breakfast before Mass just makes more sense than bringing it to Mass. Food is messy, smelly, and distracting to a lot of people. The rule of "less is more applies", and "none is best" is probably the way to go.
Which touches on....

Location, Location, Location
···†···
I am not a fan of "Cry Rooms". Putting that on the record. I don't have anything against them per se, I just don't think they do a lot of good overall to help situations except when a baby is actively crying. Many churches have them, so they can be utilized, and I will even use one occasionally, if Dino-baby is actively wailing.

Normally, we sit near the back and near a door. We tried the whole "up front so she could see" thing, and yeah, it just meant that it took longer to get to the Narthex or hallway. Again, I think this is a "what works for you" situation, but in general I think sitting in a place where there are other familes, and in a location where a quick exit is possible makes the most sense. If you can do the "up front so they can see" thing and it actually works... more power to you.

Conclusion
···†···
At the end of the day, the best rule to live by is common sense. I love seeing children at Mass, even if they make my Raptor-Child look like a ... well, an angel. I think a lot of these "rules" are really situation dependent. People like to write "bright line" rules for these things, but situations are different.

Also, I think that our children soak up everything they come in contact with. As I said, my daughter is currently a Dino-child at Mass. That doesn't mean she isn't soaking up the sacred, learning how to act, and witnesses the awesome presence of "heaven on earth." I shouldn't be trying to do too much to "distract" her from all of that. Yes it is hard, and frustrating, at times. Parenting is a labor of love. Our goal as parents shouldn't be to have the quietest kids on the block, but the kids that become saints. What we should be focused on is teaching them the proper way to interact with Holy things and places. I think that toys and other "distractions" do nothing but... distract. Easier said than done, I know.

What do you think are good rules to have? Do you disagree with anything I have said? What has worked for you in the past?




†††

An Unexpected Reset

This weekend became an opportunity to reset my mind a little bit, and actually re-charge my "batteries." I ended up having an unexpected blogging break and it has helped me re-energize my efforts and clear my mind. I have been quite muddled lately, in my thinking and writing. I looked back at some older writing I did, back in law school and college, and it made me sad to see how articulate and precise of a writer I once was. At this point, I thing blogging, twitter, and being outside of academic circles has left me to be a creature of my own device. I have become "Gollum"-like in the way I think, write, and analyze life. Things make sense to me, but when I communicate with others something is 'lost in translation.'

Sometimes I think we all get caught up in the forrest, and we lose the trees. I know that when that happens to me, as it has recently, you start to get bogged down in the things that should come naturally. For me, writing has starting to get serious. I have tried to take on my 'tasks' and have even thought about writing some more substantial things. For those regular readers, I know that is a scary thought - me writing actual and legitimate literary work. That being said, I have found myself writing quite poorly, and at quite a shallow level. I have also found myself 'behind' on a few tasks that are time sensitive and it has made me feel (an appear) sloppy. Blogging has also put strain on me at a personal level because I spend more time doing it than I should, mostly because of my struggles 'with the pen.'

Now that I have had this reset, I am hoping that my mind will be a tad more clear, and that it will help be a more efficient and coherent writer. Let's see if that actually comes to fruition. I do know that in a few weeks, there will be another slight 'break' in blogging, but it shouldn't be anything too severe. Hopefully it will give me a chance to re-evaluate how things have been going since this weekend. A sort of progress report. In the end, I just want my blogging to be indicative of the type of thinker and person that I am, but also I want it to be both a spiritual outlet and a stone that sharpens my mind. If it isn't these things, I worry it becomes a detriment to myself and would therefore be unworthy of my time and effort. I don't think that is the case... but it is a worry sometimes. I think, though, that this weekend really helped me turn a corner and plan to use it as a springboard to jump back into shape.

Now... on to more substantial matters...

Friday, November 4, 2011

The Problem With Pleasure [VP Post]


The devil doesn’t create, he lies. He doesn’t give us his side of the story and hope we agree with him, he makes us believe the God story isn’t worth the effort. So, the problem with pleasure isn’t that we seek it; it is that we seek it from the wrong things and in the wrong way. The devil doesn’t make us seek pleasure from bad things he creates, he makes pleasure empty by distorting something good, the devil doesn’t create – he distorts. So we find ourselves seeking pleasure, but never being fulfilled. Even when we seek good things, we are left empty because even things created by God are not, and can not, be an end in themselves. God is the Alpha and the Omega.



†††


Wednesday, November 2, 2011

"Thy servants and handmaids..."

"All Souls" - R. León at CIEA
Today, we the Ecclesia Militans, the Church Militant, fulfill a role like no other. Today, we especially remember and celebrate the Ecclesia Penitens, The Church Suffering - the expectant. Today we, through our prayers, help plead the case of those joyful souls who have made it to Purgatory and await only the merciful release of their souls to heaven.

If you are lucky enough to ever attend a Mass according to the usus antiquior on All Souls day, you will be treated to a Mass that is full of death, suffering and above all else JOY. Death is not an end for those who walk in the way of the Lord. It is a beginning. 

Our role...
··†··
I awoke this morning, much earlier than I normally do, and as I looked out at the cold, snow covered earth, I saw the sky starting to glow. It was clear, and so the mountains in the distance began to take shape as the sun rose. It honestly looked like the image above, but with mountains and not tombs. I thought instantly that it was my duty to do what I can today to remember the dead, and to help them finally reach Heaven. 

Secret (Second Mass, Missal of St. Andrew, © 1953):
Be favorable, O Lord, to our humble prayers on behalf of the souls of Thy servants and handmaids, for whom we offer up to Thee the sacrifice of praise: that Thou mayest vouchsafe to grant them fellowship with Thy saints. Though our Lord.
Isn't this what our faith is all about? Isn't it about the joy that comes from knowing we have a Savior? Isn't it the merciful promise to the many that if we follow Him, we will not die but have everlasting life? Isn't the hopeful expectation that we will be lead by angels into paradise?

Let us fulfill our role, let us pray for the dead. Let us live in expectation, hope, and joy that we will one day join the ranks of the Church Triumphant and be met by the holy martyrs at the holy city. 

Not the fearing death... but death without a Cross
···†···
There is a lot of discussion about things like the Dies Irae. As more Catholics embrace a seemingly more orthodox and traditional Catholic faith, things such as the Extraordinary Form of the Funeral becomes a topic of discussion. It isn't strange to hear terms such as: "Life Celebration," "Resurrection Mass," or "Memorial Mass" used in place of "Funeral Mass" or "Burial Mass" as the Catholic funeral was previously referred to. 

 The theological problems with the names themselves completely distorts our understanding and view of death. Not to mention the fact that the implication that rests on these concepts, that we die and are instantly assumed into heaven, completely fly in the face of what the Church teaches us about The Four Last Things

Death.
Judgment.
Heaven.
Hell.

In Msgr. Pope's article, he makes a very scary but honest point: How do we explain Hell to a generation (culture, society, person, etc...) with a very limited and simplified notion of God? I don't know. Just because we don't believe something to be true, doesn't mean it isn't there. Hell exists, the Devil is real, and death is final. Being "good", is a rather ambiguous manner in which to live. Do we really want to roll the dice on what we think is good, hoping it gets us to heaven? 

Now I am not saying we should live in fear, in a way where that fear becomes our motivation. Instead, we should fear the loss of heaven through our actions and sin. Many people in the Catholic faith want to make God completely forgiving. Meaning, they make him out to be a God that forgives all, no matter what.  But then what does the devil do? Does the devil only collect those souls that are "pure evil?" What is pure evil? See how this becomes a problem? 

In the end, I am going to place my hope in God, a God that judges with justice and imposes mercy. If I believe God to be the merciful God of truth, he must be just. To be just he must judge. Judgment makes right the acceptance into heaven those that followed God's law, and loved faithfully. We will all fault, O happy fault. But again, if we live according to God's commandments, we will be forgiven. Being "good" isn't enough, because "good" is a rather ambiguous term. Justice is truth. Truth is love. Let us accept a God that loves. Let us receive mercy, only once justice has been imparted.

Finally, let us not forget to pray for those that have no one to pray for them. There are many departed souls that have no one entrusted with their petitions. There are many reasons for this, but the reasons matter not. Let us simply bring forward in our mind the intention to pray for them, even if we dont know their names... God does.

From the Dies Irae:
Lo! the book exactly worded,
Wherein all hath been recorded;
Thence shall judgment be awarded.
When the Judge His seat attaineth, 
And each hidden deed arraigneth,
Nothing unavenged remaineth.
What shall I, frail man be pleading
Who for me be interceding,
When the just are mercy needing?
King of majesty tremendous, 
Who dost free salvation send us,
Fount of pity, then befriend us!


†††


Happy Birthday to a Special Little Lady!


Hey readers... today is Rebbeca's (aka The Mom) birthday. She is a sometimes-blogger here, full time over at her awesome place: "Shoved to Them", but most importantly she has become a friend of "the family." (And I dont just mean blogging family.)

She has gone out of her way to be a friend, even though she is thousands of miles away, to my wife and I. She is a loving person, and really deserves a lot of cheer today. So, take a minute, and go over to her blog and wish her a happy birthday and let her know that I sent you.

Also, keep her in your prayers... she is due with #7 this month. She seems to "go early" so she is essentially "on the clock" at this point.

St. Gerard Majella~ Ora Pro Nobis