Storm of the... Ever!

That is a large area...

The Public Hazard Warning Area is almost as large as ND,SD, NE, & KS

Western Alaska is under a storm warning and public hazard warning in what is being called the "Worst Storm in History."

For those that don't realize it, Alaska doesn't mess around. We don't hype things up. Things are rough enough without sensationalism. When I woke up this morning, I was greeted with an outdoor temp reading of -4.8°F, others on my facebook feed were posting pics of up down to -15°. For the record, it is November. So tough circumstances are common place, especially the weather. So when the impending storm is considered so bad that Alaska has been exempted from the Nationwide EAS testing tomorrow, in case the system needs to be used for an actual emergency, you know things are bad.

So let us keep Western Alaska in our prayers. That part of the state is off the road system, that means that getting supplies, should they need anything, or sustain any duration of hardship, might become difficult. The method in shipment usually consists of boats and planes. But when the worst storm, ever, is passing this way, it is hard to get things out there. So let us keep everyone in our prayers.

†††

Perplexing Providence Hospital - Why isn't this Catholic hospital 'acting' Catholic?

When one thinks of the latest scandals surrounding Catholic hospitals, it is hard to ignore that these situations from a very object point of view are completely perplexing. In the case of Providence Hospital in Anchorage, Alaska allowing the Alaska Women's Health Clinic to become a clinic inside of Providence and granting notorious Dr. Jan Whitefield privileges at the hospital flies directly in the face of Catholic teaching and doctrine.

Unfortunately Providence isn't alone in their actions, Mercy Hospital in Durango, Colorado has an almost identical situation, to which Live Action and Lila Rose came to protest. Bishop Thomas Olmsted was forced to strip St. Joseph's Hospital in Phoenix, Arizona of their Catholic "identity." It was an example of an "end game" scenario but after years of deceit and insubordinate, he was left with no option. And in development, we  see a situation in the Archdiocese of Louisville, where pressure is being placed on those in power to manipulate the Ethical and Religious Directives (ERDs) to allow for a hospital merger.

So while some may view the Providence issue as a local Alaskan issue, they would be incorrect. This issue is much deeper than some localized blip on the radar, it actually strikes at the core of what it means to be a Catholic Organization.

What is perplexing about the Providence situation, as well as these other situations, is that Catholic hospitals should have a pretty straight-forward criteria for what clinics and the partners they associate with, especially ones that they physically have in their buildings or share services with. I admit that a person could imagine various complex relationships which could be developed between a Catholic hospital and a secondary partner, and when analyzed that relationship would be difficult to determine whether it was appropriate under Catholic teaching and doctrine.

Yet, the Providence situation is a rather blatant case of an improper relationship. This relationship appears so egregious, that there must be some ulterior motive driving the decision to partner with the state's most notorious abortionist, instead of operating based on Catholic teaching. This situation is a perfect example of the necessity for Catholic hospitals to adhere to the 'Ethical and Religious Directives' (ERDs). Not only for the sake of their Catholic identity but more importantly for the sake of what it means for an organization to be Catholic within the public sphere.

Browsing Providence's site, one can find a disclaimer called: 'Services Disclaimer' which is the legalese that a hospital publishes to explain what liability exists based on the information they have on their website. Essentially it is the "disclaimer" which attaches to the website. Oddly Providence's seems contrary to their action. The disclaimer says:

Providence Health & Services does not recommend, endorse or promote any procedure or intervention that may be discussed on this site, and which may be prohibited by Providence Health & Services’ Mission and Core Values and the Roman Catholic moral tradition as articulated in such documents as The Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services.

If this is the case, why did they let Dr. Whitefield and AWHS walk right in the building and set up shop? Not only that, but how can they reconcile the actions that Dr. Whitefield is infamous for with the ERDs they are required to follow? It is just so confusing and frustrating that this hospital isn't acting very Catholic. There must be a reason, but it still perplexes me. It is hard to imagine that there is some greater and almost infinite good that must exist to justify the decision to let the clinic open and operate out of Providence.

Over the next couple of days I plan to update you on the developments in this story, as well as highlighting what other people are saying about this issue. Some great Catholic thinkers and bloggers are talking about this issue in earnest and it is comforting to know that many of things I have been thinking and writing about regarding it all align quite closely to what these other Catholics have been saying. I also plan to talk a little more about ERDs and what they are supposed to do in terms of keeping Catholic hospitals... Catholic.

Lastly... don't forget to pray and write the Archbishop. Please let the Chancery know how you feel about this issue as a Catholic. Let them know that you are praying for an outcome to this situation that is centered in truth and protects the sanctity of life.

††† 

Alaska Gov. Sean Parnell follows Gov. Rick Perry's lead: Proclaims Aug. 6 a Day of Prayer for the Nation

Alaska Governor Sean Parnell

Just saw this, and think it is a pretty stand-up move on Governor Sean Parnell's behalf. From KTUU.com:

JUNEAU, Alaska— Alaska's governor has proclaimed Saturday a day of prayer for the nation, heeding a call from Texas Gov. Rick Perry.

Gov. Sean Parnell cites Perry in the proclamation. Perry, who's considering seeking the Republican nomination for president, invited fellow governors to join him at a prayer event in Houston, Texas, Saturday. He also urged them to proclaim Aug. 6 a time to pray for "unity and righteousness."

Parnell's spokeswoman said Parnell won't attend but issued a proclamation recognizing "we are a nation under trial of war, impacts of natural disaster, threat of more severe economic hardships, and that our families are under attack on many fronts."

The proclamation urges Alaskans to seek "God's face," and pray for the people of this nation and for the strength and wisdom of leaders.

Here is the Full Proclomation, from the Governor's website:

A Day of Prayer for Our Nation
Effective Date: Saturday, August 6th, 2011

WHEREAS, throughout America’s history, our leaders have called upon us to look beyond ourselves for protection, wisdom, and strength by praying for our people and our country; and

WHEREAS, in 1779 during a time of battle and conflict, the Continental Congress issued a proclamation calling on the Almighty God…“That he will be our Shield in the Day of Battle, and our kind Parent and merciful Judge through Time and through Eternity;” and

WHEREAS, in 1863, President Abraham Lincoln proclaimed a Day of Thanksgiving, Praise, and Prayer to recognize and pay tribute to “the presence of the Almighty Father and the power of His hand” in the nation’s ongoing civil war. Americans were invited to assemble “in their customary places of worship and in the forms approved by their own consciences render the homage due to the Divine Majesty for the wonderful things He has done in the nation’s behalf;” and

WHEREAS, in a time of war and suffering, President Franklin D. Roosevelt called upon Americans in a historic radio address on June 6, 1944, to join with him in prayer to the Almighty God as we “struggle to preserve our Republic, our religion, and our civilization, and to set free a suffering humanity;” and

WHEREAS, in 1981, President Ronald Reagan recognized prayer as a “source of strength” and in a time of reflection called on the nation to “join together before God, fully aware of the trials that lie ahead and the need, yes, the necessity, for divine guidance;” and

WHEREAS, we recognize that today we are a nation under trial of war, impacts of natural disaster, threat of more severe economic hardships, and that our families are under attack on many fronts;” and

WHEREAS, like Governor Rick Perry of Texas calling the citizens of his state to pray and fast for our nation beginning August 6, 2011, we join the people of Texas and beyond in following the example of past leaders and call our citizens to prayer, that we might acknowledge the challenges facing our nation, express our inability to meet them alone, and petition our Creator and Sustainer to help our nation in this time of great need.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Sean Parnell, Governor of the State of Alaska, do hereby proclaim August 6, 2011 as:

A Day of Prayer for Our Nation

in Alaska, and encourage all Alaskans to join me and citizens across the country in humbling ourselves, seeking God’s face, and praying for the protection and provision of our nation’s people, and for the wisdom and strength of our leaders.

Dated: August 2, 2011

Now I know that moves like this aren't necessarily sledge-hammers of policy, but they do make a difference. It says something when a Governor is willing to stand before the people of his state and make a statement like this. Hopefully this gets a little media attention.

###

The Southeast Alaska Catholic Online - Diocese of Juneau, Alaska

The Southeast Alaska Catholic Online, or SeAC Online as they refer to themselves, is shaping up to be a find publication. It is refreshing to see some of the articles they are publishing. For example, two recent samplings are:

Divorce and Communion

&

Songs Mixed with Gregorian Chant

It is nice to see Catholic publications taking an interest in Liturgical and Canonical issues. Catholic diocesan publications need to realize, as do the SEAC Online and Catholic, that there is a great Catechetical opportunity with Catholic papers. The SEAC Online has upped the ante with their recent articles on Catholics and Divorce and Gregorian Chant. I would almost consider those topics taboo or third-rail when it comes to the Catholic world, so I am pleasantly surprised!

I look forward to more orthodox and enlightening articles to come! Congrats Bishop Burns!

Won't you take a minute and email the Bishop and thank him for his commitment to orthodox Catholic teachings?

The Most Reverend Bishop Edward Burns 

(Click on link above for email)

Also, I notice that Bishop Burns started a blog but hasn't kept it up much. In your email you might include a nice little word or two of encouragement in updating it more often. We need to hear from our priests, especially the Bishops!

†††

Senator Lisa Murkowski & Archbishop Schwietz, please watch this video.

From American Life League:

Sorry for doubling up on posts but I just saw this and had to post it. It is relevant to Alaskan Catholics, Canon Law geeks, and just Catholics in general. It is VERY powerful.

•••

Abortion is contrary to the teachings of the Catholic Church - Always.

Over 3200 abortions will occur today.

Canon 915 exists.

Let the Dead bury their dead.

†††

New Pastor in Kodiak brings with him a special Chalice

Father Joe Classen
Photo Credit: St. Louis Review

Kodiak parish: St. Mary's is getting a new pastor from the Archdiocese of St. Louis. The St. Louis Review printed a neat story about the priest and his special Chalice. The story tells of a priest who understands continuity and the importance of sacred items. Kodiak seems to have some good things coming their way.

From the St. Louis Review:

As Father Joe Classen makes the 5,000-plus mile journey to Alaska to start a new assignment, he'll be taking along with him an important piece of his childhood.

In mid July, Father Classen begins his work as pastor of St. Mary Parish in Kodiak, Alaska. Ordained for the Archdiocese of St. Louis in 2003, he previously had been serving as associate pastor of Holy Spirit Parish in Maryland Heights.

Coming along with him on the journey is a decades-old chalice that once belonged to his childhood pastor, Msgr. Michael Owens. Father Classen got to know the priest, who died in 1988, assisting him as a server at Mass at St. Charles Borromeo Parish in St. Charles.

<<Read the rest at the St. Louis Review>>

†††

Frontier Living

As a Catholic living in Alaska outside of the Big 3 (Anchorage, Juneau, Fairbanks) it is a very trying existence. The analogy of living on the frontier is apropos, not only is it uncharted and sparse but also somewhat lawless and 'behind the times'.

As the head of a young family, the decisions I face in terms of guiding my family in the faith are difficult and heart-wrenching. While there are a good number of loving Catholic families at the parishes here in our local area, the Church itself is something that makes me wonder if God really wants us here. Yet, at the same time there is a part of me that wonders if maybe the problems are exactly why God does want us here.

It is heart-breaking that good Catholic families can't send their children to the parish Catechism (faith formation) because of the heterodoxy and distorted virtues, that families can't get involved with the various parish ministries because they are seen as "complainers" or "extreme Catholics", or that there are children who are paraded around during their Sacraments like show dogs performing dances and tricks.

There are good and faithful Catholics that have gone in two directions. Some have complained and complained to the point of marginalization. Many of these folks have retreated and become insular, only attending Church for Mass and the Sacraments. Others have decided to compromise and accept the modern heresies for the sake of unity and community- often these folks eventually too become insular once a line "too far" is drawn.

Church here isn't about God or the Mass - it is about people and community. Those leading the parishes know there is "pain and division" but to them it isn't about problems, but a difference of "opinion" - to them the Catechism, Canon Law, GIRM, and Missal are simply guidelines.

There are a lot of problems and a lot of blame to go around. Priests, parish coordinators, and Chancery officials all are to blame - but so are we the people. We stay quiet, continue to give money, and retreat into our anger and frustration. But mostly, the blame is most fairly upon the backs of those that run the day to day operations of the parishes. This weekend alone I was emailed stories of "Birthday" Mass celebrations full of banners and balloons, homilies quickly given so as to allow lay presenters- while the priest left the sanctuary to sit with the people, and music that bordered on secular.

I have been both critical and supportive of the Church here in Alaska in the past. But at this point ... the Church in Alaska outside the big cities is broken. It isn't enough to just get by. In areas where there are WalMarts, McDonalds and internet cafes, the Church is still treated as if the area just got electricity. It is time for the Church to reform... it is time for a return to truth and orthodoxy. The last frontier should be leading the Church into glory, not into modernism and heterodoxy.

A Hidden Gem: St. John Neumann - Cooper Landing, Alaska

Many folks on the Kenai, let alone in Alaska, probably don't know about a hidden gem of a parish: St. John Neumann in Cooper Landing. To be precise, it is actually a Mission, but it has weekly Mass on Sunday at 12:30pm.

The property is about a half-mile down Snug Harbor Road, just before/over the bridge at Kenai Lake. You drive a bit up a driveway and the grounds sit at the bottom of the hillside; it is an impressive campus. The modest log church isn't anything super impressive, except that it is simplistic without being purposely vacant of sacred aesthetic. It is minimal in decoration and design, but it is culturally cohesive. It is everything that an Alaskan Mission Church should be, and in fact feels more Catholic than most of the other parishes on the peninsula. It fits into its setting and is authentic. Its design fits its purpose, there is continuity in the building and its design.

There are two out buildings, a residence type building, and  a shed that seems to house maintenance items for the Cross-walk, Stations of the Cross, and Cemetery. There is also a third structure, and really the focal point of the campus aside from the Church. It is a Marian shrine, that has beautiful stained glass. It is also handicapped accessible. It sits "inside" the Stations of the Cross walk.

The Stations of the Cross are beautiful and are a nice walk around the grounds. There is even a smaller version for wheel-chairs that points to the main crosses. I assume that these crosses are "properly erected" and so praying in-front of them offers and indulgence.

It is obvious that a lot of care and concern were taken when designing the various areas of this parish, and I am shocked that I had never heard about it, or been there before.

Cross VIII on the Handicap Stations

Handicap Stations Platform

The Stations of the Cross lead all through the grounds, surrounding the Marian Shrine. There is even a path that leads up into the woods, and up the hill to a "Cross" that sits atop the hillside behind the Church. I can't say enough how impressed I was with the campus. It exudes beauty and embraces the rustic and rural atmosphere of Alaska. It utilize natural beauty, as well as seamlessly incorporating modern ingenuity. 

Just as we were leaving, I noticed one more path that lead down towards a creek bed. I saw a statue placed back in the woods. It turned out to be another Marian shrine, this time of Our Lady of Grace. 

The Path to Mary

Creekside Shrine

I suggest you visiting the parish sometime on your drive through Cooper Landing. It is worth a 15 minute stop at the very least. Some weekend I plan on taking the family and some friends out camping that way and then attending Mass on Sunday. I just wish more of the churches on the Peninsula would take some design cues from this parish. It really is a hidden gem.

†††

Alliance Christian Fellowship, Porn, and Double Standards (PG-13?)

(N.B.: This post discusses issues and uses phrases that aren't appropriate for kids. I usually keep this blog family friendly, but it is hard to address this issue without being blunt.)

After writing my post yesterday, and re-reading the Devout Life's Post I & II on the subject, I walked away from my spiel about Alliance Christian Fellowship's "Porn Weekend Promotion" a little unsatisfied. I know why I have a problem with the billboard, and I think the topic and workshop are an OK idea (I hedge a bit due to the fact I don't really know what they are going to say), and I feel like I didn't give it a good treatment. This is mostly because I didn't explain myself well, which may be due in part to the fact that until today I didn't truly know what was wrong with the billboard. I blame most of the problem on my poor writing skills, but I digress.

Well today, I was standing in line at the store waiting to buy groceries when I realized the double standard that ACF is using. You know how at supermarkets there are check-out lanes labeled "Family Friendly"? You know, aisles with no Cosmo's or Glamour's at eye level for your 10 year old boys? Some stores even go as far as not having candy in those aisles. Some will just cover up the Cosmo with a nice plastic board. Well, who do you think argued for their implementation? It was the protestant evangelicals. It was the same people that fills the pews (or should I say fabric covered seats) of most evangelical protestant churches. It wasn't just the pictures, but the words that they wanted covered. Why? Because words have MEANING, and words have affect and effects. Because, a 9 year old boy or girl could just as easily see women wearing what they do on the covers in the store, but reading:  "100 Great Ways to Please Your Man With What You Have In Your Basket Right Now" is entirely different. Because, although there is nothing per se wrong with sex (when conducted between a married couple) there is a detrimental affect on your child when they read the words: "Have Better Sex TONIGHT!"

So you see when kids, 10 year olds (which is under the age of what even ACF deems appropriate for their workshops, read the PORN WEEKEND billboard they are affected. The effects? Well it is a query into "What is porn? And why is there a weekend about it at a church?" In fact, it looks inviting, it looks interesting, and the billboard seems to be promoting it. Again, my argument isn't that the billboard shouldn't use the word PORN, but that it how it uses it that is harmful and improper. It is a gimmick, and they are utilizing a standard which they don't normally employ: e.g. the Cosmo Argument.


Likewise would it be appropriate to have "ABORTION WEEKEND"; "Abortion and Apple Pie", "Condoms and Cake", or "Peanut Butter and Spermicidal Jelly"? How about promoting a weekend about Alcoholism with: "Keg Party Weekend!"; "Beer and Baseball"; "Shots and Ladders"; and "Tequila makes your clothes fall off"? Or what if the Catholic church did this with "Pedophilia"? There would be outrage. It isn't that these things shouldn't be talked about, but it is how it is promoted. It is the way in which the church is enticing folks to come. It is tacky and it misleads folks. Not that I think people will be tricked into coming, but it misleads those that don't know how to interpret this – Children.

As I said, I wonder what the Pastor would say about my other weekend ideas, or the Cosmo lane at the supermarket. I bet he would have some way around it, but really, ACF is wrong here. They are using a gimmick, they are fitting their church and God into the culture rather than fitting themselves into God. What is really sad, is that at the end of the day I bet this is all about money. I can almost gurantee that the group behind this, XXXChurch.com is charging a pretty penny to come here and so they have to promote in a provocative way to make sure they make money. Because isn't that what PORN is all about, making money? That is the problem with double standards, you end up right back where you start.

†††

Alliance Christian Fellowship & Porn Gimmicks

Mindy at the Devout Life is blogging again, and she has come out swinging. She has recently highlighted a gimmick by the Alliance Christian Fellowship Protestant Church in Eagle River, Alaska. They apparently have a big billboard up at the exit to Eagle River that looks like this:

Now, I don't have a problem with them having this "weekend." In fact, I applaud them, as does Mindy. What I do take issue with is the childish and tacky promotional effort they have implemented for its advertisement. It comes in the form of a silly billboard for all to see. 

Mindy takes a much more intellectual approach to her dissaproval, I take a much more, well, Joe-approach. My thoughts: "C'mon really?" We get it... shock us, shock us, with your scandalous topic. But don't do it with an ambiguous billboard that looks like that. Honestly, this is the fruits of Protestantism - they fight the culture with culture. It is sort of like fighting drugs with drugs. It might work some of the time, but you usually end up getting the person off of an illegal drug and on to a legal one. Here you are removing one cultural problem: porn, and filling the hole with another: a heretical church belief. 

I agree, the sign is tacky and they shouldn't have it up, but who am I to say that right? I am sure the Pastor there, would say something clever and edgy. Maybe he would say, "you're right, we shouldn't have to have a sign about that porn - but that's exactly why we have it." I almost feel foolish posting about it, because we are giving them exactly what they want - publicity. In fact, I almost see it analogous to the Palin thing... but for one small thing. They are claiming that this is in the name of Christianity. They have no advice on their website about how to talk about what "PORN" is to kids that can read, but don't know what it is. Again, I have no problem with the concept of this "Series." I have a problem with a public sign that looks the way that it does.

It is a gimmick, and something that I have learned is this: Religion and Gimmicks are never a good thing. Politics, products, and anything else - Gimmicks are fine. Do we really want to trick people into the truth? Nope. I dont think we do. But this is exactly what  it is... it is marketing God. I have never been to ACF, but I bet it is very modern. 

I can't believe I have typed as much as I have, and I applaud Mindy for taking this on. I on the other hand simply see this as a gimmick and like I said religious gimmicks don't work. (Update) I shouldn't say they don't work. Clearly it is "working" by getting people to notice this. What it isn't doing is drawing folks into the Sacred of what God is. But then again, Protestantism is exactly that. It is the attempt to make God relevant and modern so that people can make Him applicable to their lives, rather than making their lives relevant and applicable TO HIM.

†††

Glen Biegel has some questions for Mark Begich

Mark Begich has announced a "Town Hall" this Wednesday in Anchorage. "Begich expects to answer questions on oil and gas development in Alaska, Medicare, the 2012 budget and other issues." Begich is a self professed Catholic and so his stance on issues are open to inquiry and analysis under Catholic Teaching and Canon Law.

Local radio host Glen Biegel, himself a Catholic, has posted some questions on his Facebook page that he thinks should be asked of Begich.

1. Why not trade your vote on Obamacare?
2. If you can force me to buy something that I don't need, something I don't want, something that I likely won't use, why is that good?
3. Have you converted anyone over from a no vote on ANWR to a yes vote.
4. What is the most common objection to ANWR?
5. What is the best objection to ANWR in your mind?
6. Change or repeal ESA? EPA? Clean Air/Water Acts?
7. Do you know what the burden of debt is per person for the next generation? In yen?
8. Can you explain why another bureacrat will straighten out the rest of the bureacrats? Isn't the answer to get the bureacrats out of our way, not add more?
9. Did you ever criticize the Republicans for having large budget deficits?
10. Did you ever claim to be pro-life?
11. Do you support the Defense of Marriage Act?
12. What prevents the US from just continuing to borrow money? What will happen to us if we just continue to print and borrow money?

The fact that he claims to be Catholic, and of most importance to this blog, would make Begich's answers to questions 9, 10 & 11 the most interesting, but I think these are all fair and relevant questions that Biegel raises. I don't think Begich would feel that way though. In fact, he is rather "touchy" about his Catholicism and any criticism thereof.

Again, Catholic Representatives and Senators need to be in line with Catholic Teaching and Canon Law. Having them out there promoting their version of the Faith only weakens it. Bishops need to get strong and utilize Canon Law (915 for example) and help guide these folks into the fold. 

If anyone goes to the Town Hall, and asks these questions or hears them asked, I'd love to hear his answers. I'd also love it if some more pointed questions were asked about his Catholicism. Then again, I don't think he would like that very much, and I don't know if the Archbishop would either. Why? Because the answers would put both Begich and the Archbishop (unfortunately) in a very, very sticky spot.

###

Attention Alaska Catholic Youth Conference (ACYC) Attendees

If you are planning on going to ACYC this summer either as a student, presenter, or chaperone, please send me an email, Tweet, or Facebook message.

I have a couple of questions and a want to propose something to you.

If you aren't going and are an Alaskan Catholic Youth... I would suggest registering and go! Catholic Youth Conferences are a good thing regardless of content, because they put you in touch with other young Catholics willing to take time out of their lives to seek Christ.

###

Prayers for our parish

St. Eustace ~ Ora Pro Nobis

Dearest blog readers, I come to you seeking prayers for my parish. I have never said where I belong, although it isn't hard to figure out, out of respect for my friends and fellow parishioners. I have never wanted to bring scandal or my own ideas down upon the parish in a negative way. This blog has been a way for me to seek spiritual nourishment, but that doesn't mean of course that at times I am wrong in my opinions and assessments of things.

That being said, please pray for my parish. We are horribly divided and face many trials. There are the usual issues regarding liturgical abuses, lay leadership, and wayward Catechesis. Beyond that though, we also face a disunity problem like none I have ever seen. Not only do we lack unity, but there are active movements preventing certain "portions" of the Church from being active in the community.

I see little improvement in any of these areas in the future, and I would ask that you pray first for miracles. I pray that there will be a change in hearts for those persons that "run" the parish. I pray for an apostolate, mission, order, or some other religious community desire to open up shop in our area giving those that are more loyal to the magisterium and orthodox members some sort of spiritual reprieve. Second, I would ask that you pray for our strength and courage in these difficult times. I am purposefully vague, because again I don't want to bring "outside" eyes into our personal household mess, but I ask that those of us that are troubled will have the fortitude to remain steadfast in our faith, and to be able to better live out our vocation as members of the Body of Christ.

I thank you for you time, but most importantly I thank you for your prayers.

†††

Break-up

Photo Link

In Alaska, the period between Winter and Spring is called "Break-Up." It comes from the fact that so much of Alaskan life revolves around the Ocean or Rivers, and as snow and ice "break-up" there is this odd time where it isn't quite spring as the temperature is still to cold, but the days are long and sunny and make us pine for the summer that will soon be here. The roads are wet, the snow is melting, the rivers are starting to flow, things are getting dirty and dingy and yet hints of green and spring abound.

What accompanies these physical events is a mood that settles over the people. It is a quiet anticipation for what is to come. Sometimes it feels as if it is frustration, almost a cabin fever. While other times it is smirk and a secretive laugh, it is as if we have all been the prisoners of old man winter and although he doesn't know it yet, we have been let in on the secret that the prison doors will be sprung open any day now and we will all be free. Don't get me wrong, we Alaskans love our winters, but "break-up" is a cathartic thing, it is releasing the winter, it is a joyous funeral for a friend that long outlived expectations – it is a loss, acceptance, and the moving on of our souls from one thing to another. Underneath all of this though is a restlessness. A restlessness that contains happiness, fear, expectation, joy, trepidation, confusion, anger, acceptance, and a myriad of other contradictory emotions. It is almost too much to bottle up under one skin. But we Alaskans go through this every year, and come a few months from now when the days never end, and the winter chill is a long forgotten memory, the endless summer is our only hope.

···†···

accepting reality for what it is - real

As many of you know, although this blog focuses on Alaska, this post isn't about the weather. It is about another break-up, one that has been brewing longer than many realized. The mercury has been rising in this world for quite a while, although no one really thought to check the thermometer, because no one really thought winter would come to an end. The thing about break-up is that at some point you just have to accept it. No matter how big a fan you are of snowmachines, ice skating, skiing, or anything else... the snow will melt, and the best we can do is accept it and ready the fishing poles, boats, and camping gear. If we don't, we will be left snowshoeing in mud and skiing on rocks.

The thing about break-up in nature is that it occurs naturally. The heat is caused by the seasons, and summer will always come just as the sun will always rise. You can't fight it so the best you can hope for is to embrace it. Conversely, in social situations break-up occurs only when one "side" is so unwilling to accept reality that the force and pressure of their denial creates a "bursting" pressure on the social landscape. It forces events and people to act and react to things that never had to be. It is preventable, and yet once put into motion almost never stops.

So, when you see the cracks forming explaining that you see the ice melting, and the river starting to flow doesn't make you the cause it makes you a realist. Getting ready to ride the river tides wherever they may flow isn't to say that you are quitting winter, but accepting spring. Sometimes the transition isn't easy, and not everyone accepts it at the same time. Many a years do we find ice fisherman bravely (or stupidly?) sitting in puddles out on lakes getting in every last second of winter. Every break-up folks are caught skiing in areas they shouldn't only to be swept away by avalanches that were sure to occur, not because of their place but because of the time. Each spring you are sure to see a snowmachine traversing the battle worn trails only to find themselves in a muddle puddle and struggling through - a product not of stupidity but one of unwillingness.

···†···

the ice will melt and the river will flow

So for those wondering - the cracks are forming. The ice is thinning. The springtime is coming. None of this is so, because of what I say – instead I simply am telling what I see and hear. Sometimes it takes weeks, sometimes months, and sometimes even decades - once in motion though it is hard to stop. Once the ice breaks and the river begins to flow I know not where it will take us. Maybe somewhere nice, and maybe somewhere not, I just know that the river will flow. If we choose to let it take us, who knows where we will go; we might not take it and might ride out the change, and if we take it we might even come back one day. Nothing about the changing of the seasons is certain but for one thing. Once you see the cracks forming... the ice will melt and the river will flow.

The Iditarod

...It is underway and in full swing.

I have illusions of racing it one day, I know, I am crazy, but it would be amazing!

The Iditarod - Website

###

Parnell says 'No' to ObamaCare for Alaska

AK Gov. Sean Parnell

Awesome news, from Becky Bohrer and the ADN:

JUNEAU -- Alaska Gov. Sean Parnell said he will not implement the federal health care overhaul because a judge in Florida struck down the law as unconstitutional.

It's not immediately clear what practical impact the unusual move would have on Alaskans, an estimated 14 percent of whom are uninsured year-round. A major expansion of the federal law is still pending, and a legal expert and health care consumer advocate say any refusal by the states to participate in the law is an invitation to the federal government to step in and implement it for them.

Parnell, who sought the advice of his attorney general amid concerns implementing the law would violate his oath of office, told the Juneau Chamber of Commerce the state would pursue lawful, market-based solutions to making insurance affordable and accessible to Alaskans.

He said the Florida federal district judge's ruling is the law of the land, as it pertains to Alaska, barring implementation of the federal law here. He said the state will pursue options of its own instead.

Alaska was one of 26 states that were party to the Florida lawsuit; however, in other cases, two federal judges have upheld the law and one judge ruled a provision requiring citizens to buy health insurance or face penalties -- a major point of contention in the Florida case -- is unconstitutional but did not strike down the rest of the law.

While the ultimate decision is likely to rest with the U.S. Supreme Court, for now, the overhaul is the law of the land, contends Timothy S. Jost, a professor at the Washington and Lee University School of Law.

"This is one renegade judge that has reached this decision," he said. In refusing to participate in the law, he said, Alaska "is really the outlier" among states.

Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA, said currently states have an "enormous amount of discretion" in how they implement provisions of the law. If the governor refuses to exercise that, the federal government will have the say, he said.

Read more: ADN.com

This obviously isn't a settled question, but it is nice to see the Governor proving some of us [yes, myself included] wrong about the type of Governor that he really is. This scores another point for him in my book!

### 

ArchD of Anchorage: Updates and News

Just wanted to post about some happenings in the the Archdiocese of Anchorage. Most of these events are in Anchorage, of course.[1] There are a lot of great things going on in some places, and just because I, and some others can't take advantage of them, doesn't mean that they shouldn't be discussed.

Fr. Brundage Tuesday Evening Lecture Series:
St. Andrew Church pastor Father Tom Brundage continues a Tuesday evening lecture series.

• Feb. 1 and 8: “The Sexual Abuse Crisis in the Catholic Church: Origins and Reform”
• March 15 and 22: “Introduction to Canon Law”
• March 29: “Lenten Reflection”
• April 5: “The Return of the Latin Mass”
• April 12: “Making Saints.”

The lectures are held at 6:45 p.m. at Gruening Middle School in Eagle River. [2]
[Link: Catholic Anchor]


Roman Missal Workshop - March 3rd
Feb. 1 Deadline for early bird special for the One-Day Workshop on the New Translation of the Roman Missal that will be on March 3
This workshop is designed for Deacons, Deacon Wives, Religious, Pastoral Associates, Lay Leaders, Liturgy Leaders, Music Ministers, and those interested in the liturgy.
Deadline for early bird special is February 1 for both the workshop and hotel rooms.
Workshop presenters are from the USCCB and the Federation of Diocesan Liturgical Commissions.

Sponsored by the Dioceses of Juneau, Fairbanks and Archdiocese of Anchorage.
Please visit your parish office for the registration form or email/call Kim Bakic for more information: kbakic@caa-ak.org or 297-7755.

···°···

There are other events that are upcoming that look worthwhile, but because I can not vouch for the presenters or content, I can't in good conscience advertise them on my blog.[3]  So make sure to keep your eye on the Anchor's website, they do a good job of keeping events and news up to date!

···•···

Notes:
[1] That was meant to be snarky. We have little to no "activities" down here that are in any way orthodox or spiritually enriching. It is frustrating, and before a comment comes in the form of: "well you should start something." We have, several times. Any time we want to do anything it is altered, quelled, prevented, or oppressed. Maybe it is time to use this blog in a more direct way, like the Pope encouraged recently? I don't know... pray for us.

[2] Does anyone know if this is being advertised to a larger audience in some way, and is therefore at a more "public" venue and not at the Church? That would be AWESOME evangelization!

[3] The true arbiters and interpreters of the the teachings of the Church are of course our clergy. That doesn't mean though that as a lay person I shouldn't give my opinion, defend the faith, and attempt in my frailty to uphold the teachings of the Church. Mostly I try and remain silent unless I have some personal knowledge. Therefore, know that when I post something that it is solely my opinion and not meant to be the official interpretation of doctrine – in other words: who am I? Yet, at the same time, as I said, I attempt to make sure that my blog is a true testament to the teachings of God and His bride, the Church - not my preference or personal desire of what that should be.  Confusing, I know.

†††

The Alaskan Pro-Life Battle - Personhood Initiative & Mead Treadwell

Alaska Lt. Gov. -
Mead Treadwell

Recently, a reader posted a comment on the blog asking our take on a situation that recently occurred in the State of Alaska. It has to do with the rejection by the state of a ballot iniative. The Catholic Anchor reported about it and a few of the Pro-Life websites did as well, but little analysis was done. The comment left on our blog felt that the "ball was dropped" in this case by the Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell.

The proposed initiative is what many call a "Personhood" initiative. The purpose is to establish legal protection for unborn/pre-born persons, or more correctly to create legislation that establishes "personhood" at the moment of conception. A lot of the initiatives revolve around terms and their definitions. The purpose of such initiatives is to find a way through legislation to by-pass the judicial law created by the Roe v. Wade decision. It is a very complex legal issue because so much depends on the interplay between state law and federal Constitutional law. The question the commentator was asking is what our take was on Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell's hand in this particular scenario. Here is an excerpt from their comment:

I like Mead, but he really dropped the ball on this one; one could argue he also abrogated his duties as a Catholic legislator. And yes, I know he was a big contributor to the ballot initiative in August.

But that just means that a lot of people helped him win the primary so that he could use his powers as Lt Gov to effect the same causes.

···•°···

The issue here is whether the Lt. Gov. acted properly both in his role as Lt. Gov. and as a Catholic - because he is Catholic. The latter is actually his primary duty, regardless of what Senator Lisa Murkowski thinks. So we have to look at this specific issue and this specific proposed ballot initiative and not at some theoretical or philosophical level where we are fighting over concepts and not specific sets of facts.

Therefore we should first look at the language of the proposed ballot initiative:

Click to Enlarge

Now, the wording itself is problematic. It is very vague and there is a strong likelihood that it would be overturned at the state supreme court level. The Attorney General and the Lt. Gov. felt the same way. As the Anchor reported:

Alaska’s new Attorney General John Burns said the proposed initiative for the 2012 election is unconstitutional because it would go up against the Supreme Court’s decision allowing virtually unlimited abortions under Roe v. Wade.

“The proposed bill meets the ‘clearly unconstitutional’ standard because it would supersede a woman’s constitutional right to privacy. This right is a federal constitutional right recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade,” Burns’ office said. It added that Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell should reject the measure as well.

Today, Treadwell did just that, according to the Juneau Empire.

“I was convinced the controlling case law made (the initiative) clearly unconstitutional,” Treadwell said.

···•°··· 

Now was this a "pass" as my commentator opines? Maybe, but I doubt it. The Lt. Gov. is a strong Catholic and placed his fortune and career on the line with his support of Proposal 2 this past fall. But did he "abrogate his duty as a Catholic" by not approving the measure and letting the chips fall where they may? I would argue no, and I think most Bishops would agree with me. Not only that, he might have done his Catholic duty by actually denying the certification. In fact, Archbishop Chaput of Denver, a strong Bishop known for his Catholic Natural Law writing  issued a letter regarding a very similar issue just a few years back:

Archbishop Charles Chaput

June 5, 2008


Statement of the Colorado Catholic Bishops
on the 2008 Colorado Personhood Amendment


We admire the goals of this year's effort to end abortion, and we remain committed to defending all human life from conception to natural death. As we have said from the start, however, we do not believe that this year's Colorado Personhood Amendment is the best means to pursue an end to abortion in 2008.


Unfortunately, even if this year's personhood amendment is passed in Colorado, lower federal courts interpreting this amendment will be required to apply the permissive 1973 Roe v. Wade abortion decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. It is also likely that the Supreme Court, given its current composition, will either decline to review such a case, effectively killing the state amendment, or worse, actively reaffirm the mistaken jurisprudence of Roe. While the Church respects those promoting this personhood amendment, the Catholic Bishops of Colorado decline to support its passage because it does not provide a realistic opportunity for ending or even reducing abortions in Colorado.
Constructive alternatives to reduce abortions and advance the ultimate objective of ending abortion, however, do exist at the state level.
...
+Most Rev. Charles J. Chaput, O.F.M. Cap.
+Most Rev. Arthur N. Tafoya, D.D.
+Most Rev. Michael J. Sheridan, S.T.D.

As they said, with such a proposal a bad court, like our state supreme court, or the Supreme Court of the United States would deny such a law, "...or worse, actively reaffirm the mistaken jurisprudence of Roe." This isn't some obscure strain of belief held by three priests in Colorado either; Nevada Life, the Georgia Bishops, Americans United for Life, and the Florida Bishops all feel the way I do. This might be the reason why Pro-Life groups in Alaska didn't support this measure.

···°•···

Is it frustrating? Yes, of course it is. I would love to have seen the Lt. Gov. certify it and say - "Let's let the courts decide." But if that happened... the victory would be short and in the end it might end up creating a platform for an even greater loss down the road. 

Does this mean that the Lt. Gov. or elected Catholic officials should weigh legislation for their chances of victory as a means to determining when they should or shouldn't support Pro-Life laws? Of course it doesn't, but this fight is too important to fight over gimmicks. The way to end abortion is to reverse the incorrect legal decision that celebrates its anniversary a few days from now: Roe v. Wade. 

Could the Lt. Gov. been more precise and clear in his explanation as to why he didn't certify this initiative? Sure he could of, but we will leave that to his press person to improve upon. It certainly would have been helpful to have him explain that as a Pro-Life elected official it is his goal is to enact laws that stem from the Natural Law and that will ultimately respect the sanctity of life, and while the Personhood initiative seems like it does just that, because it is somewhat gimmicky in its construction it is ultimately problematic.  That is why I can't fault him for his decision here. In fact, after reading the statements of Bishops on the matter I actually applaud what he did here, and so should you. 

†††

Alaska state senate republicans 'Not Convinced' that taxes are a job-killer

Gov. Sean Parnell

File this under "Are you serious?" Alaska State Senate Republicans are pushing back on Gov. Sean Parnell and the House regarding Parnell's plan to cut oil taxes industry wide. I am not kidding, this from the Anchorage Daily News:

JUNEAU -- The 2011 session of the Alaska Legislature began Tuesday with senators saying Gov. Sean Parnell's proposal to slash oil taxes could have a hard time getting passed before lawmakers go home.


"I've heard a lot of pushback among legislators just from chatting in the hallway about it," said Senate President Gary Stevens, a Republican from Kodiak. "It's going to be a hard sell."

Sen. Gary Stevens

Parnell is asking the Legislature to agree to cut taxes by an estimated $5 billion between 2013 and 2017. It's an issue likely to dominate while the Legislature is in session for the next three months.


Parnell and top Republicans in the state House describe the profits tax as a job killer. But key senators are not convinced and say they need to get more information about the impact of the oil tax system imposed under Gov. Sarah Palin in 2007.

Particularly contentious could be the Republican Parnell's plan to lower the base production tax rate from 25 percent to 15 percent for new oil fields. It's a piece of his broader effort to lower taxes.

Sen. Bert Stedman

"The chance of it going to 15 (percent) is slim," said Sitka Republican Sen. Bert Stedman, who is co-chair of the Senate Finance Committee.

The article goes on to explain that studies are inconclusive as to whether high taxes have a negative effect on oil companies investing and expanding operations in the state. What is bothersome is that it is simple: taxes mean less money to the companies, meaning they get less dollar-for-dollar on their investment. The worst part is that the tax is profit based and actually increases as oil prices go up:

Much of the complaint about the profits tax is how it rises from the base rate of 25 percent when oil prices go up. The Revenue Department said the tax is about 33 percent when oil is at $75 a barrel. Parnell wants to change how the curve works.

Read more: ADN - Legislature, Oil Taxes

It is easy folks: Taxes are bad. They hurt jobs, profits, the economy, and small woodland creatures. Less taxes is good - always.

###

Alaska questions answered: For Belinda

Belinda – of Belinda's Brain asked some questions about ALASKA in a comment a while ago... and due to my sloth in answering she had to "Google the answers" for herself. I wanted to make sure I at least attempted to address the questions, since I started this post shortly after reading her comment. Hopefully I can add a little something to her knowledge.

All of these answers will be based on where we live, I will try and add how some other places in Alaska are, but I haven't been to a lot of Bush Alaska, so I cant answer too much. Also, please jump in AK'ns - I am sure I will make some statements you will disagree with since most AK'ns have a different experience depending on where they live.

Here we go...

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS:

Is Alaska super cold right now?

Well right now, it isnt. But let me say this - I live in Coastal Alaska, or in a more southern part, right near the water. This helps keep things a little more mild, and a little less snowy. Now that isn't to say we aren't subject to Alaskan winters... but it isn't as bad. When we came back to Michigan at the beginning of the month, the coldest it had gotten was -10. We had about 8-14" of snow on the ground where I was. Now this may seem like a lot, but it settles over time, and we have a lot more open space - so clearing the roads isn't that hard or bad. When we left the temperature was on average getting up to about 18 as a high and -2 as a low. Not to bad...really. Currently they are having a warm spell where the temps are around 30-40. Now, where I live our weather is similar to Anchorage. It isn't the exact same, but I wont get into the nuances. Compare this to Fairbanks that has has some -30 & -40 days. In the summer we usually get between 55 & 65 every day in June - August. Sometimes we get higher, but this past summer we had 31 straight days of rain... so it was a little odd.

Do we have snow?

The snow thing is weird. Again, where I live we had around 8"-14". Since then though, we have gotten more, but it has also warmed so we lost some. Now we are right near the water. So we get a little less actually due to the warmth. But we also sometimes get dumped on when weather gets trapped by mountains. Now if you go 15-25 miles inland, you start getting a lot more snow. Also, as you drive into the mountains and the pass, you literally are talking FEET of snow. My wife drove through the pass during Halloween weekend, and there were already 1-3' of snow by then in the pass. Where I live is very comparable to Northern Michigan/Wisconsin/Minnesota.

Do we have to work outside?

A lot of folks do. Currently... I am unemployed. [Please pray for me.] But as someone with a law degree and experience in press/public relations - I am hoping I don't have to work outside. But if need be... that is what I will do. Now when you work outside, there is a limit to what you have to do, and a way to deal with it. A lot of folks that work up on the Slope, or the oil fields up on the "top" of Alaska have to go in and out of buildings a lot. There are times though when due to the weather they will essentially "lock down" the area, where people aren't really allowed outside. For those that do work outside though, they are pretty hardcore and I have the utmost respect for them. There are little things here and there that most Alaskans have to do outside.

Snow Days:

One awesome thing about Alaska is that folks don't really complain about the weather!! As someone from Michigan, this was immediately noticeable. As for school kids, in the two school years that I have been there, there has been one 'No School Day.' It was because we got freezing rain. I don't mean drizzle, I mean... literally I couldnt drive faster than 5 mph the last 3 miles home. Usually, they will only close it if there is so much snow that the buses can't travel, which is rare. Again this is based on what I have seen in my area. Now in Anchorage, or other areas with unique landscapes, this might be different. I know Anchorage has snow issues when they just get dumped on, and I am sure they have more snow days. As a note, I am pretty sure that kids go outside until it is 0 degrees in most places for "recess." So kids are supposed to come prepared for that sort of thing.

Sunlight:

Alaska is BIG. So where we are... we get a lot more sunlight than say, Fairbanks. At its shortest, the day is about 5 1/2 hours. So that is like 1030a - 4pm. So it really isn't that bad. In fact, when you think about it... most people are at work during the daylight hours, regardless of where you are. In the summer though, this is awesome, because it is reversed, but better. It never really gets dark. Sure, there is this dusky twilight thing that happens, and you sorta have to use flashlights in the woods or headlights on the car in the middle of the night, but it is awesome being out until midnight doing whatever. In reality, it is a lot of fun. The hardest part is when there is snow on the ground, and you want to do something on a Saturday, but cant get out until 10/11am. Then the next thing you know, the day is over a few hours later. To be honest though, by February things are getting back to normal and it is a lot of fun.

Distance to Things:

This is really subjective. A lot of people live in some pretty remote areas of Alaska, like Bush Alaska. [Bush means pretty much anywhere that isn't in the southeast and southcentral area of Alaska, plus Fairbanks.] So getting to a store might mean literally jumping in a plane. For others, it might mean a trip of 50-60 miles on the weekend. For us, we were literally between 2 towns for a while, with a max trip of about 6 miles. Right now we are about 20 miles from town, but we do have a little store about 8 miles away to get some things if need be. Again, this really depends on where you live, and my experience isn't very interesting, so I cant describe days where I had to load up the dog sled and mush a day or two into 'town.' We were actually surprised at how big our 'town' was.

The Aurora Borealis:

We haven't seen it in Alaska. We are actually in one of the harder areas of the state to see it, since we are so low, and just the geography of where we are. In Fairbanks, and places just a little north of us, you can see it a majority of the year, and most clear days in the winter. Last year was also a "down year" for the Northern Lights. My wife wants to see it, but of course, we have been in Michigan during the good part of the winter when it exists, so when we get back I have a feeling we will be taking a drive somewhere to watch it.

Mexican Restaurants:

I am not sure why you think there would be a lot? Maybe this is something that I don't get culturally... but there are quite a few for such a small area. This intrigues me.... I think I will be doing some Googling myself.

Bears in our yard:

We haven't seen any in our yard, but our friends down the road have. We also lived pretty close to town for a majority of our time, so we were a little less likely to see them in our yard... but they are around, and you cant keep your trash anywhere accessible. That being said, we have seen them very close to where we live, and I have seen more than my fair share. We also hunt the Black Bear, so we go looking for them. We do see lots of Moose in our yard, and that is cool... but also a little intimidating sometimes. We do see quite a bit of wildlife, and during the fish runs, there are a lot more bear around. You do always have to be on guard, and firearms and bear spray are necessities. 

Neighborhood:

We used to live in what I would call a rural neighborhood. Now, we live in ... well I dont know. The houses are close together because we are on the river, but we are way out of town. Again, everywhere is different. Anchorage is your typical city life, the Valley (where the Palin's) live are a mix of bedroom community and rural-suburbia, and then there is a little of everything else. The Bush and villages are very remote and people are both in town  and remote.  So it depends on where you live, and what you want. Things are a lot more spread out for the most part, but most towns have a neighborhood area to them, and it confuses me. I dont know why you would want to live in Alaska and live on TOP of one another. A little land and space would make sense... wouldnt it?

Other questions:

Again these are my experiences... and I am sure some of my Alaskan readers from places like Anchorage, Homer, Fairbanks, Juneau, etc... could chime in with very different experiences. But please feel free to email me... 

Link

###